Abstract
This article explores reading assessments which occur in the classroom under the control of the class teacher. It considers group and individual norm-referenced tests, their advantages and disadvantages, and then discusses different kinds of computer-based test. Thereafter, it explores an authentic assessment of real reading, through systematic observation, group discussions, affective and motivational inventories, phonic and pre-reading sub-skills checklists, informal reading inventories and reading miscue inventories, retellings, fluency, portfolios, computer-aided assessment of real books, and peer and self-assessments. It concludes with the assertion that a formative assessment of reading in the classroom is more important than external high-stakes or psychometric testing.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | International encyclopedia of education |
| Editors | Penelope Peterson, Eva Baker, Barry McGaw |
| Place of Publication | Oxford |
| Publisher | Elsevier |
| Pages | 189-195 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Edition | 3rd |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9780080448947 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9780080448930 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2010 |
Keywords
- Literacy
- Reading
- Children
- Education
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Assessment in schools related to literacy: reading'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver