Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Assessment of association between lower ureteric excision technique and oncological outcomes for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: retrospective analysis from the Scottish Renal Cancer Consortium

  • James Peter Blackmur (Lead / Corresponding author)
  • , Etienne Chew
  • , Matthew Trail
  • , Katie Brodie
  • , Nicola Santoni
  • , Flora Rodger
  • , David Hamilton
  • , Fortis Gaba
  • , Sophie Randall
  • , Sarika Nalagatla
  • , Brian Little
  • , Khalid Janjua
  • , Clare Sweeney
  • , Andrew Martindale
  • , Khaver Qureshi
  • , Antony Riddick
  • , Kevin O’Connor
  • , S. Alan McNeill
  • , Simon Phipps
  • , Mark L. Cutress
  • Edward A. A. Mains, Ian Dunn, Sarah Reid, Grant D. Stewart, Gavin Lamb, Muhammad Zeeshan Aslam, Steve Leung, Ross Clark, Ian Wilson, Grenville Oades, Alexander Chapman, Alexander Laird

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

152 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: Nephroureterectomy(NU) remains the gold-standard surgical option for the management of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma(UTUC). Controversy exists regarding the optimal excision technique of the lower ureter. We sought to compare post-UTUC bladder tumour recurrence across the Scottish Renal Cancer Consortium(SRCC).

Methods: Patients who underwent NU for UTUC across the SRCC 2012–2019 were identified. The impact of lower-end surgical technique along with T-stage, N-stage, tumour location and focality, positive surgical margin, pre-NU ureteroscopy, upper-end technique and adjuvant mitomycin C administration were assessed by Kaplan–Meier and Cox-regression. The primary outcome was intra-vesical recurrence-free survival (B-RFS).

Results: In 402 patients, the median follow-up was 29 months. The lower ureter was managed by open transvesical excision in 90 individuals, transurethral and laparoscopic dissection in 76, laparoscopic or open extra-vesical excision in 31 and 42 respectively, and transurethral dissection and pluck in 163. 114(28.4%) patients had a bladder recurrence during follow-up. There was no difference in B-RFS between lower-end techniques by Kaplan–Meier (p = 0.94). When all factors were taken into account by adjusted Cox-regression, preceding ureteroscopy (HR 2.65, p = 0.001), lower ureteric tumour location (HR 2.16, p = 0.02), previous bladder cancer (HR 1.75, p = 0.01) and male gender (HR 1.61, p = 0.03) were associated with B-RFS.

Conclusion: These data suggest in appropriately selected patients, lower ureteric management technique does not affect B-RFS. Along with lower ureteric tumour location, male gender and previous bladder cancer, preceding ureteroscopy was associated with a higher recurrence rate following NU, and the indication for this should be carefully considered.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)757-765
Number of pages9
JournalWorld Journal of Urology
Volume41
Early online date24 Jan 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2023

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Nephroureterectomy
  • Recurrence-free survival
  • Surgical technique
  • Upper tract urothelial carcinoma
  • UTUC

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessment of association between lower ureteric excision technique and oncological outcomes for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: retrospective analysis from the Scottish Renal Cancer Consortium'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this