Assessment of professionalism: recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference

Brian David Hodges, Shiphra Ginsburg, Richard Cruess, Sylvia Cruess, Rhena Delport, Fred Hafferty, Ming-Jung Ho, Eric Holmboe, Matthew Holtman, Sadayoshi Ohbu, Charlotte Rees, Olle Ten Cate, Yusuke Tsugawa, Walther Van Mook, Val Wass, Tim Wilkinson, Winnie Wade

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    193 Citations (Scopus)


    Over the past 25 years, professionalism has emerged as a substantive and sustained theme, the operationalization and measurement of which has become a major concern for those involved in medical education. However, how to go about establishing the elements that constitute appropriate professionalism in order to assess them is difficult. Using a discourse analysis approach, the International Ottawa Conference Working Group on Professionalism studied some of the dominant notions of professionalism, and in particular the implications for its assessment. The results presented here reveal different ways of thinking about professionalism that can lead towards a multi-dimensional, multi-paradigmatic approach to assessing professionalism at different levels: individual, inter-personal, societalinstitutional. Recommendations for research about professionalism assessment are also presented.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)354-363
    Number of pages10
    JournalMedical Teacher
    Issue number5
    Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2011


    Dive into the research topics of 'Assessment of professionalism: recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this