Assessment of small-airways disease using alveolar nitric oxide and impulse oscillometry in asthma and COPD

Peter A. Williamson, Karine Clearie, Daniel Menzies, Sriram Vaidyanathan, Brian J. Lipworth

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    60 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The contribution of the alveolar compartment to exhaled nitric oxide (alveolar nitric oxide or CA(NO)) can be calculated as a surrogate of distal inflammation. This value should be corrected for nitric oxide produced in the conducting airways which "back-diffuses" into the alveolar compartment (Corrected CA(NO)). Impulse oscillometry (IOS) (Nava et al., Am J Respir Crit Care Med 168:1432-1437, 2003) is used to derive values for peripheral airways resistance. Twenty-four healthy volunteers, 21 severe asthmatics, 15 mild-to-moderate asthmatics, and 24 COPD patients were assessed with spirometry, impulse oscillometry, and fractionated exhaled nitric oxide. Compared to healthy volunteers, FENO was higher in mild-to-moderate and severe asthmatics: geometric mean fold ratios of 1.91 (P = 0.02) and 2.74 (P < 0.001), respectively. However, there was no difference for mild-to-moderate versus severe asthma. Ratios for CA(NO) were not different for severe asthma versus COPD, but both were elevated compared to that of healthy volunteers [2.64 (P < 0.001) and 3.07 (P < 0.001), respectively] and mild-to-moderate asthma [1.95 (P = 0.04) and 2.28 (P < 0.01)]. However, after correction for axial diffusion, Corrected CA(NO) was increased in COPD compared to severe asthma (geometric mean fold ratio 1.28, P = 0.04), mild-to-moderate asthma (1.34, P < 0.01), and healthy volunteers (1.28, P = 0.02), and there was no difference between other groups. R5 and RF were reduced in healthy volunteers versus mild-to-moderate asthma (P = 0.011 and P < 0.001 respectively), severe asthma (P = 0.002 and P < 0.001), and COPD (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001). Peripheral resistance (R5-R20) was not different for healthy versus mild-to-moderate asthma but was higher in severe asthma (P < 0.001) and COPD (P < 0.001). Correlations were observed between R5-R20 versus FEF25-75 (r = 0.71, P < 0.01), CA(NO) (r = 0.44, P < 0.01), and Corrected CA(NO) (r = 0.24, P < 0.01). CA(NO) and IOS provide additional information to traditional measures of spirometry and tidal nitric oxide. Previous data reporting elevated alveolar nitric oxide in severe asthma may reflect back-diffusion of nitric oxide from the conducting airways into the alveolar compartment. Corrected CA(NO) and IOS may prove to be useful noninvasive measurements of small-airways disease.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)121-129
    Number of pages9
    JournalLung
    Volume189
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Apr 2011

    Keywords

    • Airway markers
    • Asthma
    • COPD
    • Forced oscillation technique
    • Exchanged dynamics
    • Flow rate
    • Model
    • Mild
    • Hyperresponsiveness
    • Plethysmography
    • Inflammation
    • Obstruction
    • Spirometry

    Cite this

    Williamson, Peter A. ; Clearie, Karine ; Menzies, Daniel ; Vaidyanathan, Sriram ; Lipworth, Brian J. / Assessment of small-airways disease using alveolar nitric oxide and impulse oscillometry in asthma and COPD. In: Lung. 2011 ; Vol. 189, No. 2. pp. 121-129.
    @article{607602e5d99f46958e05cdd618a9301a,
    title = "Assessment of small-airways disease using alveolar nitric oxide and impulse oscillometry in asthma and COPD",
    abstract = "The contribution of the alveolar compartment to exhaled nitric oxide (alveolar nitric oxide or CA(NO)) can be calculated as a surrogate of distal inflammation. This value should be corrected for nitric oxide produced in the conducting airways which {"}back-diffuses{"} into the alveolar compartment (Corrected CA(NO)). Impulse oscillometry (IOS) (Nava et al., Am J Respir Crit Care Med 168:1432-1437, 2003) is used to derive values for peripheral airways resistance. Twenty-four healthy volunteers, 21 severe asthmatics, 15 mild-to-moderate asthmatics, and 24 COPD patients were assessed with spirometry, impulse oscillometry, and fractionated exhaled nitric oxide. Compared to healthy volunteers, FENO was higher in mild-to-moderate and severe asthmatics: geometric mean fold ratios of 1.91 (P = 0.02) and 2.74 (P < 0.001), respectively. However, there was no difference for mild-to-moderate versus severe asthma. Ratios for CA(NO) were not different for severe asthma versus COPD, but both were elevated compared to that of healthy volunteers [2.64 (P < 0.001) and 3.07 (P < 0.001), respectively] and mild-to-moderate asthma [1.95 (P = 0.04) and 2.28 (P < 0.01)]. However, after correction for axial diffusion, Corrected CA(NO) was increased in COPD compared to severe asthma (geometric mean fold ratio 1.28, P = 0.04), mild-to-moderate asthma (1.34, P < 0.01), and healthy volunteers (1.28, P = 0.02), and there was no difference between other groups. R5 and RF were reduced in healthy volunteers versus mild-to-moderate asthma (P = 0.011 and P < 0.001 respectively), severe asthma (P = 0.002 and P < 0.001), and COPD (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001). Peripheral resistance (R5-R20) was not different for healthy versus mild-to-moderate asthma but was higher in severe asthma (P < 0.001) and COPD (P < 0.001). Correlations were observed between R5-R20 versus FEF25-75 (r = 0.71, P < 0.01), CA(NO) (r = 0.44, P < 0.01), and Corrected CA(NO) (r = 0.24, P < 0.01). CA(NO) and IOS provide additional information to traditional measures of spirometry and tidal nitric oxide. Previous data reporting elevated alveolar nitric oxide in severe asthma may reflect back-diffusion of nitric oxide from the conducting airways into the alveolar compartment. Corrected CA(NO) and IOS may prove to be useful noninvasive measurements of small-airways disease.",
    keywords = "Airway markers, Asthma, COPD, Forced oscillation technique, Exchanged dynamics, Flow rate, Model, Mild, Hyperresponsiveness, Plethysmography, Inflammation, Obstruction, Spirometry",
    author = "Williamson, {Peter A.} and Karine Clearie and Daniel Menzies and Sriram Vaidyanathan and Lipworth, {Brian J.}",
    year = "2011",
    month = "4",
    doi = "10.1007/s00408-010-9275-y",
    language = "English",
    volume = "189",
    pages = "121--129",
    journal = "Lung",
    issn = "0341-2040",
    publisher = "Springer Verlag",
    number = "2",

    }

    Assessment of small-airways disease using alveolar nitric oxide and impulse oscillometry in asthma and COPD. / Williamson, Peter A.; Clearie, Karine; Menzies, Daniel; Vaidyanathan, Sriram; Lipworth, Brian J.

    In: Lung, Vol. 189, No. 2, 04.2011, p. 121-129.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Assessment of small-airways disease using alveolar nitric oxide and impulse oscillometry in asthma and COPD

    AU - Williamson, Peter A.

    AU - Clearie, Karine

    AU - Menzies, Daniel

    AU - Vaidyanathan, Sriram

    AU - Lipworth, Brian J.

    PY - 2011/4

    Y1 - 2011/4

    N2 - The contribution of the alveolar compartment to exhaled nitric oxide (alveolar nitric oxide or CA(NO)) can be calculated as a surrogate of distal inflammation. This value should be corrected for nitric oxide produced in the conducting airways which "back-diffuses" into the alveolar compartment (Corrected CA(NO)). Impulse oscillometry (IOS) (Nava et al., Am J Respir Crit Care Med 168:1432-1437, 2003) is used to derive values for peripheral airways resistance. Twenty-four healthy volunteers, 21 severe asthmatics, 15 mild-to-moderate asthmatics, and 24 COPD patients were assessed with spirometry, impulse oscillometry, and fractionated exhaled nitric oxide. Compared to healthy volunteers, FENO was higher in mild-to-moderate and severe asthmatics: geometric mean fold ratios of 1.91 (P = 0.02) and 2.74 (P < 0.001), respectively. However, there was no difference for mild-to-moderate versus severe asthma. Ratios for CA(NO) were not different for severe asthma versus COPD, but both were elevated compared to that of healthy volunteers [2.64 (P < 0.001) and 3.07 (P < 0.001), respectively] and mild-to-moderate asthma [1.95 (P = 0.04) and 2.28 (P < 0.01)]. However, after correction for axial diffusion, Corrected CA(NO) was increased in COPD compared to severe asthma (geometric mean fold ratio 1.28, P = 0.04), mild-to-moderate asthma (1.34, P < 0.01), and healthy volunteers (1.28, P = 0.02), and there was no difference between other groups. R5 and RF were reduced in healthy volunteers versus mild-to-moderate asthma (P = 0.011 and P < 0.001 respectively), severe asthma (P = 0.002 and P < 0.001), and COPD (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001). Peripheral resistance (R5-R20) was not different for healthy versus mild-to-moderate asthma but was higher in severe asthma (P < 0.001) and COPD (P < 0.001). Correlations were observed between R5-R20 versus FEF25-75 (r = 0.71, P < 0.01), CA(NO) (r = 0.44, P < 0.01), and Corrected CA(NO) (r = 0.24, P < 0.01). CA(NO) and IOS provide additional information to traditional measures of spirometry and tidal nitric oxide. Previous data reporting elevated alveolar nitric oxide in severe asthma may reflect back-diffusion of nitric oxide from the conducting airways into the alveolar compartment. Corrected CA(NO) and IOS may prove to be useful noninvasive measurements of small-airways disease.

    AB - The contribution of the alveolar compartment to exhaled nitric oxide (alveolar nitric oxide or CA(NO)) can be calculated as a surrogate of distal inflammation. This value should be corrected for nitric oxide produced in the conducting airways which "back-diffuses" into the alveolar compartment (Corrected CA(NO)). Impulse oscillometry (IOS) (Nava et al., Am J Respir Crit Care Med 168:1432-1437, 2003) is used to derive values for peripheral airways resistance. Twenty-four healthy volunteers, 21 severe asthmatics, 15 mild-to-moderate asthmatics, and 24 COPD patients were assessed with spirometry, impulse oscillometry, and fractionated exhaled nitric oxide. Compared to healthy volunteers, FENO was higher in mild-to-moderate and severe asthmatics: geometric mean fold ratios of 1.91 (P = 0.02) and 2.74 (P < 0.001), respectively. However, there was no difference for mild-to-moderate versus severe asthma. Ratios for CA(NO) were not different for severe asthma versus COPD, but both were elevated compared to that of healthy volunteers [2.64 (P < 0.001) and 3.07 (P < 0.001), respectively] and mild-to-moderate asthma [1.95 (P = 0.04) and 2.28 (P < 0.01)]. However, after correction for axial diffusion, Corrected CA(NO) was increased in COPD compared to severe asthma (geometric mean fold ratio 1.28, P = 0.04), mild-to-moderate asthma (1.34, P < 0.01), and healthy volunteers (1.28, P = 0.02), and there was no difference between other groups. R5 and RF were reduced in healthy volunteers versus mild-to-moderate asthma (P = 0.011 and P < 0.001 respectively), severe asthma (P = 0.002 and P < 0.001), and COPD (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001). Peripheral resistance (R5-R20) was not different for healthy versus mild-to-moderate asthma but was higher in severe asthma (P < 0.001) and COPD (P < 0.001). Correlations were observed between R5-R20 versus FEF25-75 (r = 0.71, P < 0.01), CA(NO) (r = 0.44, P < 0.01), and Corrected CA(NO) (r = 0.24, P < 0.01). CA(NO) and IOS provide additional information to traditional measures of spirometry and tidal nitric oxide. Previous data reporting elevated alveolar nitric oxide in severe asthma may reflect back-diffusion of nitric oxide from the conducting airways into the alveolar compartment. Corrected CA(NO) and IOS may prove to be useful noninvasive measurements of small-airways disease.

    KW - Airway markers

    KW - Asthma

    KW - COPD

    KW - Forced oscillation technique

    KW - Exchanged dynamics

    KW - Flow rate

    KW - Model

    KW - Mild

    KW - Hyperresponsiveness

    KW - Plethysmography

    KW - Inflammation

    KW - Obstruction

    KW - Spirometry

    U2 - 10.1007/s00408-010-9275-y

    DO - 10.1007/s00408-010-9275-y

    M3 - Article

    VL - 189

    SP - 121

    EP - 129

    JO - Lung

    JF - Lung

    SN - 0341-2040

    IS - 2

    ER -