Author Reflections on Creating Accessible Academic Papers

Rachel Menzies, Garreth W. Tigwell, Michael Crabb

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract


Academic papers demonstrate inaccessibility despite accessible writing resources made available by SIGACCESS and others. The move from accessibility guidance to accessibility implementation is challenging for authors. Our work focuses on understanding what challenges authors of academic papers face in creating content elements (e.g., tables, charts, images) to better understand how to improve accessibility. We classified 3866 content elements from 330 papers covering a 10-year sample of academic work from ASSETS to understand the variety used. We also reflected on the design choices that make the content elements inaccessible. We then conducted interviews with 13 academic authors from PhD student through to Professor Emeritus that publish within top-tier accessibility and HCI venues to understand the challenges faced in creating accessible content. We found critical issues in how academics understand and implement accessibility while also balancing the visual design of the paper. We provide recommendations for improving accessibility in the academic paper writing process and focus on steps that can be taken by authors, publishers, researchers, and universities.
Original languageEnglish
JournalACM Transactions on Accessible Computing
Early online date5 Jul 2022
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 5 Jul 2022

Keywords

  • Human-centered computing
  • Accessibility
  • Content Elements
  • Charts
  • Tables
  • Images

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Author Reflections on Creating Accessible Academic Papers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this