Basic life support instructor training: comparison of instructor-led and self-guided training

Eric L Einspruch, Jennifer Lembach, Bonnie Lynch, William Lee, Richard Harper, Ross J Fleischman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this randomized trial, the authors compared the instructional quality of instructor candidates trained in instructional methods through an Internet-based versus a traditional classroom-led version of the American Heart Association Core Instructor Course. The self-guided, Internet-based group had significantly higher posttest scores than did the traditional instructor-led group (although not when adjusted for pretest scores). The Internet-based group scores changed from 54% to 67%, exceeding the a priori definition of 8% as a minimally practically significant improvement (instructor-led group scores changed from 49% to 53%). The Internet-based course appeared to be a suitable alternative to the traditional course.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)E4-E9
Number of pages6
JournalJournal for nurses in staff development : JNSD : official journal of the National Nursing Staff Development Organization
Volume27
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2011

Keywords

  • Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/education
  • Clinical Competence
  • Education, Distance/methods
  • Educational Measurement/methods
  • Educational Status
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
  • Humans
  • Internet
  • Models, Educational
  • Statistics as Topic
  • United States

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Basic life support instructor training: comparison of instructor-led and self-guided training'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this