Abstract
Studies of rhetorical strategies, and particularly rhetorical figures, in advertising have largely focused on positive contexts and generating positive responses, such as increasing the likeability of ads (e.g. Delbaere et al., 2011; McQuarrie and Phillips, 2005). However, Theodorakis et al. (2015) argue that applying rhetoric in controversial ads may not weaken possible negative responses and could even worsen them. Controversial advertising encompasses a range of predominantly negative responses from distaste and disgust, through offence, outrage and embarrassment, to shock and surprise, from a part of the population (Huhmann and Mott-Stenerson, 2008; Waller, 2005).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Advances in Advertising Research |
| Editors | Enrique Bigne, Sara Rosengren |
| Publisher | European Advertising Academy |
| Pages | 229 |
| Number of pages | 240 |
| Volume | X |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 978-3-658-24878-9 |
| ISBN (Print) | 978-3-658-24878-9, ISBN 978-3-658-24877-2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Oct 2019 |
Publication series
| Name | European Advertising Academy |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Springer |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Behind the Rhetorical Scenes of Offence: A Rhetorical Analysis of Complained-About Offensive Advertising'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver