Beliefs, identities and educational practice

A Q methodology study of general practice supervisors

Valérie Dory (Lead / Corresponding author), Marie Claude Audétat, Charlotte Rees

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction Quality of supervisory practices varies. According to the integrative model of behaviour prediction, supervisors' beliefs may influence practice. This study aimed to examine the belief profiles of general practice supervisors, and their potential relationship with supervisory practice. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted using Q-methodology to explore supervisors' beliefs and the Maastricht Clinical Teaching Questionnaire to measure self-reported supervisory practice. Results One-hundred and thirty-nine supervisors took part (76%). The most common belief profile (36.7%) comprised a proactive view of supervisors' roles, strong self-efficacy beliefs and awareness of university norms. It revealed merged identities as clinicians and teachers. The second profile (18.0%) included a belief that supervision essentially involved sharing one's experience, uncertainty about the impact of supervision and about university norms. This profile was consistent with a pre-eminence of supervisors' identities as clinicians. Supervisors with merged identities were more likely to have more experience as supervisors and to engage in other teaching activities. Differences in self-reported supervisory practice were observed but did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.053). Conclusions Supervisors' beliefs reveal differences in the way they manage their multiple professional identities. Further research should be conducted into whether these differences are developmental and if so how development occurs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)66-78
Number of pages13
JournalEducation for Primary Care
Volume26
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Oct 2015

Fingerprint

General Practice
Teaching
Self Efficacy
Uncertainty
Cross-Sectional Studies
Research

Keywords

  • Faculty development
  • Family practice
  • Graduate
  • Medical education
  • Q methodology
  • Supervision

Cite this

@article{51a720d90f5e4ef8a7cbc16c85bb68f6,
title = "Beliefs, identities and educational practice: A Q methodology study of general practice supervisors",
abstract = "Introduction Quality of supervisory practices varies. According to the integrative model of behaviour prediction, supervisors' beliefs may influence practice. This study aimed to examine the belief profiles of general practice supervisors, and their potential relationship with supervisory practice. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted using Q-methodology to explore supervisors' beliefs and the Maastricht Clinical Teaching Questionnaire to measure self-reported supervisory practice. Results One-hundred and thirty-nine supervisors took part (76{\%}). The most common belief profile (36.7{\%}) comprised a proactive view of supervisors' roles, strong self-efficacy beliefs and awareness of university norms. It revealed merged identities as clinicians and teachers. The second profile (18.0{\%}) included a belief that supervision essentially involved sharing one's experience, uncertainty about the impact of supervision and about university norms. This profile was consistent with a pre-eminence of supervisors' identities as clinicians. Supervisors with merged identities were more likely to have more experience as supervisors and to engage in other teaching activities. Differences in self-reported supervisory practice were observed but did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.053). Conclusions Supervisors' beliefs reveal differences in the way they manage their multiple professional identities. Further research should be conducted into whether these differences are developmental and if so how development occurs.",
keywords = "Faculty development, Family practice, Graduate, Medical education, Q methodology, Supervision",
author = "Val{\'e}rie Dory and Aud{\'e}tat, {Marie Claude} and Charlotte Rees",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1080/14739879.2015.11494316",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "66--78",
journal = "Education for Primary Care",
issn = "1473-9879",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "2",

}

Beliefs, identities and educational practice : A Q methodology study of general practice supervisors. / Dory, Valérie (Lead / Corresponding author); Audétat, Marie Claude; Rees, Charlotte.

In: Education for Primary Care, Vol. 26, No. 2, 07.10.2015, p. 66-78.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beliefs, identities and educational practice

T2 - A Q methodology study of general practice supervisors

AU - Dory, Valérie

AU - Audétat, Marie Claude

AU - Rees, Charlotte

PY - 2015/10/7

Y1 - 2015/10/7

N2 - Introduction Quality of supervisory practices varies. According to the integrative model of behaviour prediction, supervisors' beliefs may influence practice. This study aimed to examine the belief profiles of general practice supervisors, and their potential relationship with supervisory practice. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted using Q-methodology to explore supervisors' beliefs and the Maastricht Clinical Teaching Questionnaire to measure self-reported supervisory practice. Results One-hundred and thirty-nine supervisors took part (76%). The most common belief profile (36.7%) comprised a proactive view of supervisors' roles, strong self-efficacy beliefs and awareness of university norms. It revealed merged identities as clinicians and teachers. The second profile (18.0%) included a belief that supervision essentially involved sharing one's experience, uncertainty about the impact of supervision and about university norms. This profile was consistent with a pre-eminence of supervisors' identities as clinicians. Supervisors with merged identities were more likely to have more experience as supervisors and to engage in other teaching activities. Differences in self-reported supervisory practice were observed but did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.053). Conclusions Supervisors' beliefs reveal differences in the way they manage their multiple professional identities. Further research should be conducted into whether these differences are developmental and if so how development occurs.

AB - Introduction Quality of supervisory practices varies. According to the integrative model of behaviour prediction, supervisors' beliefs may influence practice. This study aimed to examine the belief profiles of general practice supervisors, and their potential relationship with supervisory practice. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted using Q-methodology to explore supervisors' beliefs and the Maastricht Clinical Teaching Questionnaire to measure self-reported supervisory practice. Results One-hundred and thirty-nine supervisors took part (76%). The most common belief profile (36.7%) comprised a proactive view of supervisors' roles, strong self-efficacy beliefs and awareness of university norms. It revealed merged identities as clinicians and teachers. The second profile (18.0%) included a belief that supervision essentially involved sharing one's experience, uncertainty about the impact of supervision and about university norms. This profile was consistent with a pre-eminence of supervisors' identities as clinicians. Supervisors with merged identities were more likely to have more experience as supervisors and to engage in other teaching activities. Differences in self-reported supervisory practice were observed but did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.053). Conclusions Supervisors' beliefs reveal differences in the way they manage their multiple professional identities. Further research should be conducted into whether these differences are developmental and if so how development occurs.

KW - Faculty development

KW - Family practice

KW - Graduate

KW - Medical education

KW - Q methodology

KW - Supervision

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983096110&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14739879.2015.11494316

DO - 10.1080/14739879.2015.11494316

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 66

EP - 78

JO - Education for Primary Care

JF - Education for Primary Care

SN - 1473-9879

IS - 2

ER -