Benefits and risks of direct access to treatment by dental care professionals

a rapid evidence review

    Research output: Book/ReportCommissioned report

    303 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Over 100 research dental and other health-related papers were identified as relevant for this review of direct access. The quality of the evidence regarding direct access issues to dental care practitioners was varied but as a whole of moderately good quality.
    •The material was overwhelmingly related to the work of dental hygienists and dental therapists, mostly US in origin.
    •There was no evidence of significant issues of patient safety resulting from the clinical activity of DCPs.
    •There was strong evidence that access to dental care improved as a result of direct access arrangements, of cost benefits to patients, and of high levels of patent satisfaction.
    •There was some evidence that DCPs may over-refer patients to dentists, which may ensure patient safety but lead to wasteful use of resources and a high level of ‘no shows’ on referral.
    •There was evidence of ongoing training needs to strength the assessment and referral skills of DCPs in respect to patients with other health problems or risk factors, but little evidence that dentists are any less in need of such training.
    Original languageEnglish
    PublisherGeneral Dental Council
    Commissioning bodyGeneral Dental Council
    Number of pages85
    Publication statusPublished - 29 Jun 2012

    Fingerprint

    Dental Care
    Patient Safety
    Dentists
    Referral and Consultation
    Dental Hygienists
    Dental Research
    Health
    Cost-Benefit Analysis
    Tooth
    Therapeutics

    Cite this

    @book{36f2ce4db07546aaac47003c0d839927,
    title = "Benefits and risks of direct access to treatment by dental care professionals: a rapid evidence review",
    abstract = "Over 100 research dental and other health-related papers were identified as relevant for this review of direct access. The quality of the evidence regarding direct access issues to dental care practitioners was varied but as a whole of moderately good quality.•The material was overwhelmingly related to the work of dental hygienists and dental therapists, mostly US in origin.•There was no evidence of significant issues of patient safety resulting from the clinical activity of DCPs.•There was strong evidence that access to dental care improved as a result of direct access arrangements, of cost benefits to patients, and of high levels of patent satisfaction.•There was some evidence that DCPs may over-refer patients to dentists, which may ensure patient safety but lead to wasteful use of resources and a high level of ‘no shows’ on referral.•There was evidence of ongoing training needs to strength the assessment and referral skills of DCPs in respect to patients with other health problems or risk factors, but little evidence that dentists are any less in need of such training.",
    author = "Steve Turner and Sheela Tripathee and Stephen MacGillivray",
    year = "2012",
    month = "6",
    day = "29",
    language = "English",
    publisher = "General Dental Council",

    }

    Benefits and risks of direct access to treatment by dental care professionals : a rapid evidence review. / Turner, Steve; Tripathee, Sheela; MacGillivray, Stephen.

    General Dental Council, 2012. 85 p.

    Research output: Book/ReportCommissioned report

    TY - BOOK

    T1 - Benefits and risks of direct access to treatment by dental care professionals

    T2 - a rapid evidence review

    AU - Turner, Steve

    AU - Tripathee, Sheela

    AU - MacGillivray, Stephen

    PY - 2012/6/29

    Y1 - 2012/6/29

    N2 - Over 100 research dental and other health-related papers were identified as relevant for this review of direct access. The quality of the evidence regarding direct access issues to dental care practitioners was varied but as a whole of moderately good quality.•The material was overwhelmingly related to the work of dental hygienists and dental therapists, mostly US in origin.•There was no evidence of significant issues of patient safety resulting from the clinical activity of DCPs.•There was strong evidence that access to dental care improved as a result of direct access arrangements, of cost benefits to patients, and of high levels of patent satisfaction.•There was some evidence that DCPs may over-refer patients to dentists, which may ensure patient safety but lead to wasteful use of resources and a high level of ‘no shows’ on referral.•There was evidence of ongoing training needs to strength the assessment and referral skills of DCPs in respect to patients with other health problems or risk factors, but little evidence that dentists are any less in need of such training.

    AB - Over 100 research dental and other health-related papers were identified as relevant for this review of direct access. The quality of the evidence regarding direct access issues to dental care practitioners was varied but as a whole of moderately good quality.•The material was overwhelmingly related to the work of dental hygienists and dental therapists, mostly US in origin.•There was no evidence of significant issues of patient safety resulting from the clinical activity of DCPs.•There was strong evidence that access to dental care improved as a result of direct access arrangements, of cost benefits to patients, and of high levels of patent satisfaction.•There was some evidence that DCPs may over-refer patients to dentists, which may ensure patient safety but lead to wasteful use of resources and a high level of ‘no shows’ on referral.•There was evidence of ongoing training needs to strength the assessment and referral skills of DCPs in respect to patients with other health problems or risk factors, but little evidence that dentists are any less in need of such training.

    M3 - Commissioned report

    BT - Benefits and risks of direct access to treatment by dental care professionals

    PB - General Dental Council

    ER -