Beyond Common Law: Contractual Privity in Australia and South Africa

Luca Siliquini-Cinelli, Andrew Hutchison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Privity and the inter-twined notion of consideration are key features of the classical Common law of contract. The need to protect reasonable expectations has created problems for Common law courts in the past, however, leading to adaptation of the doctrine of privity by both precedent and statute in many jurisdictions. This paper will move beyond the Common law in its analysis, however, through the use of both comparative law and sociolegal theory. The target jurisdictions of Australia and South Africa have both historically been strongly influenced by the English Common law of contract, but South Africa is a mixed legal system and Australian law has also developed along an independent path, particularly with regard to the protection of reasonable expectations. Our analysis will be based around three specific case studies, in order to contextualize the doctrine of privity and to describe the ‘law in action’, following an approach which draws on relational, or socially embedded, analysis. Our ultimate aim is to move from micro, black-letter case studies to an emergent macro picture. Given the (historically) cornerstone status of privity in the Common law, this will allow us to comment on themes such as convergence and divergence from the classical law of contract, and will also give an insight into comparative legal culture and context in both target countries.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)49-79
JournalJournal of Comparative Law
Volume12
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

common law
law of obligations
Law
doctrine
jurisdiction
legal system
statute
divergence

Cite this

@article{488e10773d8d4637a84896c7648cab20,
title = "Beyond Common Law: Contractual Privity in Australia and South Africa",
abstract = "Privity and the inter-twined notion of consideration are key features of the classical Common law of contract. The need to protect reasonable expectations has created problems for Common law courts in the past, however, leading to adaptation of the doctrine of privity by both precedent and statute in many jurisdictions. This paper will move beyond the Common law in its analysis, however, through the use of both comparative law and sociolegal theory. The target jurisdictions of Australia and South Africa have both historically been strongly influenced by the English Common law of contract, but South Africa is a mixed legal system and Australian law has also developed along an independent path, particularly with regard to the protection of reasonable expectations. Our analysis will be based around three specific case studies, in order to contextualize the doctrine of privity and to describe the ‘law in action’, following an approach which draws on relational, or socially embedded, analysis. Our ultimate aim is to move from micro, black-letter case studies to an emergent macro picture. Given the (historically) cornerstone status of privity in the Common law, this will allow us to comment on themes such as convergence and divergence from the classical law of contract, and will also give an insight into comparative legal culture and context in both target countries.",
author = "Luca Siliquini-Cinelli and Andrew Hutchison",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "49--79",
journal = "Journal of Comparative Law",
issn = "1477-0814",
number = "1",

}

Beyond Common Law : Contractual Privity in Australia and South Africa. / Siliquini-Cinelli, Luca; Hutchison, Andrew.

In: Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2017, p. 49-79.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond Common Law

T2 - Contractual Privity in Australia and South Africa

AU - Siliquini-Cinelli, Luca

AU - Hutchison, Andrew

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Privity and the inter-twined notion of consideration are key features of the classical Common law of contract. The need to protect reasonable expectations has created problems for Common law courts in the past, however, leading to adaptation of the doctrine of privity by both precedent and statute in many jurisdictions. This paper will move beyond the Common law in its analysis, however, through the use of both comparative law and sociolegal theory. The target jurisdictions of Australia and South Africa have both historically been strongly influenced by the English Common law of contract, but South Africa is a mixed legal system and Australian law has also developed along an independent path, particularly with regard to the protection of reasonable expectations. Our analysis will be based around three specific case studies, in order to contextualize the doctrine of privity and to describe the ‘law in action’, following an approach which draws on relational, or socially embedded, analysis. Our ultimate aim is to move from micro, black-letter case studies to an emergent macro picture. Given the (historically) cornerstone status of privity in the Common law, this will allow us to comment on themes such as convergence and divergence from the classical law of contract, and will also give an insight into comparative legal culture and context in both target countries.

AB - Privity and the inter-twined notion of consideration are key features of the classical Common law of contract. The need to protect reasonable expectations has created problems for Common law courts in the past, however, leading to adaptation of the doctrine of privity by both precedent and statute in many jurisdictions. This paper will move beyond the Common law in its analysis, however, through the use of both comparative law and sociolegal theory. The target jurisdictions of Australia and South Africa have both historically been strongly influenced by the English Common law of contract, but South Africa is a mixed legal system and Australian law has also developed along an independent path, particularly with regard to the protection of reasonable expectations. Our analysis will be based around three specific case studies, in order to contextualize the doctrine of privity and to describe the ‘law in action’, following an approach which draws on relational, or socially embedded, analysis. Our ultimate aim is to move from micro, black-letter case studies to an emergent macro picture. Given the (historically) cornerstone status of privity in the Common law, this will allow us to comment on themes such as convergence and divergence from the classical law of contract, and will also give an insight into comparative legal culture and context in both target countries.

UR - https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3013071

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 49

EP - 79

JO - Journal of Comparative Law

JF - Journal of Comparative Law

SN - 1477-0814

IS - 1

ER -