Bosnia and Herzegovina: An Archetypical Example of an Ethnocracy

John Hulsey, Dejan Stjepanović

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This chapter presents an analysis of elections in Bosnia and Herzegovina from 1996 to 2014. The analysis shows that the way in which Bosnia and Herzegovina’s party system can be best described is as an ‘ethnocracy’, whereby representation and contestation is channeled through parties defined by ethnic divisions. Ethnic divisions in Bosnia are reflected across the whole party system which results in high levels of congruence across all type of elections for the same group of voters but very low levels of congruence across regions. Hence, Bosnia’s party system is poorly nationalized. The major parties play a key role at all levels of government but the particular combination of parties depends on the ethnic composition of each constituency.

Original languageUndefined/Unknown
Title of host publicationRegional and National Elections in Eastern Europe
Subtitle of host publicationTerritoriality of the Vote in Ten Countries
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
Pages35-58
Number of pages24
ISBN (Electronic)978-1-137-51787-6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Feb 2017

Keywords

  • Europe
  • Arena

Cite this

Hulsey, J., & Stjepanović, D. (2017). Bosnia and Herzegovina: An Archetypical Example of an Ethnocracy. In Regional and National Elections in Eastern Europe: Territoriality of the Vote in Ten Countries (pp. 35-58). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51787-6_2
Hulsey, John ; Stjepanović, Dejan. / Bosnia and Herzegovina : An Archetypical Example of an Ethnocracy. Regional and National Elections in Eastern Europe: Territoriality of the Vote in Ten Countries. Palgrave Macmillan, 2017. pp. 35-58
@inbook{b243c927efcb431b8098ae68efa948c2,
title = "Bosnia and Herzegovina: An Archetypical Example of an Ethnocracy",
abstract = "This chapter presents an analysis of elections in Bosnia and Herzegovina from 1996 to 2014. The analysis shows that the way in which Bosnia and Herzegovina’s party system can be best described is as an ‘ethnocracy’, whereby representation and contestation is channeled through parties defined by ethnic divisions. Ethnic divisions in Bosnia are reflected across the whole party system which results in high levels of congruence across all type of elections for the same group of voters but very low levels of congruence across regions. Hence, Bosnia’s party system is poorly nationalized. The major parties play a key role at all levels of government but the particular combination of parties depends on the ethnic composition of each constituency.",
keywords = "Europe, Arena",
author = "John Hulsey and Dejan Stjepanović",
note = "no funding info",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1057/978-1-137-51787-6_2",
language = "Undefined/Unknown",
pages = "35--58",
booktitle = "Regional and National Elections in Eastern Europe",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan",

}

Hulsey, J & Stjepanović, D 2017, Bosnia and Herzegovina: An Archetypical Example of an Ethnocracy. in Regional and National Elections in Eastern Europe: Territoriality of the Vote in Ten Countries. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 35-58. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51787-6_2

Bosnia and Herzegovina : An Archetypical Example of an Ethnocracy. / Hulsey, John; Stjepanović, Dejan.

Regional and National Elections in Eastern Europe: Territoriality of the Vote in Ten Countries. Palgrave Macmillan, 2017. p. 35-58.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Bosnia and Herzegovina

T2 - An Archetypical Example of an Ethnocracy

AU - Hulsey, John

AU - Stjepanović, Dejan

N1 - no funding info

PY - 2017/2/14

Y1 - 2017/2/14

N2 - This chapter presents an analysis of elections in Bosnia and Herzegovina from 1996 to 2014. The analysis shows that the way in which Bosnia and Herzegovina’s party system can be best described is as an ‘ethnocracy’, whereby representation and contestation is channeled through parties defined by ethnic divisions. Ethnic divisions in Bosnia are reflected across the whole party system which results in high levels of congruence across all type of elections for the same group of voters but very low levels of congruence across regions. Hence, Bosnia’s party system is poorly nationalized. The major parties play a key role at all levels of government but the particular combination of parties depends on the ethnic composition of each constituency.

AB - This chapter presents an analysis of elections in Bosnia and Herzegovina from 1996 to 2014. The analysis shows that the way in which Bosnia and Herzegovina’s party system can be best described is as an ‘ethnocracy’, whereby representation and contestation is channeled through parties defined by ethnic divisions. Ethnic divisions in Bosnia are reflected across the whole party system which results in high levels of congruence across all type of elections for the same group of voters but very low levels of congruence across regions. Hence, Bosnia’s party system is poorly nationalized. The major parties play a key role at all levels of government but the particular combination of parties depends on the ethnic composition of each constituency.

KW - Europe

KW - Arena

U2 - 10.1057/978-1-137-51787-6_2

DO - 10.1057/978-1-137-51787-6_2

M3 - Chapter

SP - 35

EP - 58

BT - Regional and National Elections in Eastern Europe

PB - Palgrave Macmillan

ER -

Hulsey J, Stjepanović D. Bosnia and Herzegovina: An Archetypical Example of an Ethnocracy. In Regional and National Elections in Eastern Europe: Territoriality of the Vote in Ten Countries. Palgrave Macmillan. 2017. p. 35-58 https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51787-6_2