TY - JOUR
T1 - Breaking the Boundaries of ‘Self’
T2 - Representations of Spatial Indeterminacy
AU - Modeen, Mary
N1 - This article arose from a presentation delivered to the conference Transgressions, hosted in Bristol on 21-23 Nov, 2013, by the Architectural Humanities Research Association, in which I delivered an illustrated presentation. The artistic practices of several contemporary artists are included as illustrations of porous spatial conceits, reinforced with philosophical mandates for breaking out of enclosed bodily identities
PY - 2014/11
Y1 - 2014/11
N2 - Bodily notions of the self, that is, the body as an existential form which occupies space, is reconsidered here in alternative ways that might be considered ‘transgressive’. The representations of various contemporary artists suggest ways in which we break out of the barriers of our bodies, extending beyond the enclosure of skin. So, too, do recent and contemporary philosophers, who offer alternatives to spatial modes of thinking, in which metaphysical comprehension and produced space helps us shift our allegiance to fixity and closure. In fact, these models of identity, as contained within contour lines or set names, suggest that the concept of ‘self’ as a spatially ‘contained’ enclosure is perhaps too limiting. With implications for architecture, and changing modes of spatial practices, this discussion moves toward an emerging aesthetic of indeterminacy. This term, ‘indeterminacy’, as applied here refers to that which is purposively blended, combined, porous, and multiply-layered; it is applied to bodies as we creatively imagine the Self that extends beyond the containment of our skins. By extension, this focus on presencing with blurred edges, so to speak, on porous models that merge body with that which is ‘not-body’, leads us to the promotion of this particular aesthetic.
AB - Bodily notions of the self, that is, the body as an existential form which occupies space, is reconsidered here in alternative ways that might be considered ‘transgressive’. The representations of various contemporary artists suggest ways in which we break out of the barriers of our bodies, extending beyond the enclosure of skin. So, too, do recent and contemporary philosophers, who offer alternatives to spatial modes of thinking, in which metaphysical comprehension and produced space helps us shift our allegiance to fixity and closure. In fact, these models of identity, as contained within contour lines or set names, suggest that the concept of ‘self’ as a spatially ‘contained’ enclosure is perhaps too limiting. With implications for architecture, and changing modes of spatial practices, this discussion moves toward an emerging aesthetic of indeterminacy. This term, ‘indeterminacy’, as applied here refers to that which is purposively blended, combined, porous, and multiply-layered; it is applied to bodies as we creatively imagine the Self that extends beyond the containment of our skins. By extension, this focus on presencing with blurred edges, so to speak, on porous models that merge body with that which is ‘not-body’, leads us to the promotion of this particular aesthetic.
KW - aesthetics of indeterminacy
KW - bodily transgression
KW - breaking boundaries
KW - spatial porosity
KW - multiplicity
KW - representational space
KW - art and philosophy
U2 - 10.2752/205078214X14107818390630
DO - 10.2752/205078214X14107818390630
M3 - Special issue
SN - 2050-7828
VL - 2
SP - 337
EP - 359
JO - Architecture and Culture
JF - Architecture and Culture
IS - 3
ER -