Bronchiectasis insanity: Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results?

Mark Metersky (Lead / Corresponding author), James Chalmers

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    14 Citations (Scopus)
    150 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Bronchiectasis is an increasingly common disease with a significant impact on quality of life and morbidity of affected patients. It is also a very heterogeneous disease with numerous different underlying etiologies and presentations. Most treatments for bronchiectasis are based on low-quality evidence; consequently, no treatments have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration or the European Medicines Agency for the treatment of bronchiectasis. The last several years have seen numerous clinical trials in which the investigational agent, thought to hold great promise, did not demonstrate a clinically or statistically significant benefit. This commentary will review the likely reasons for these disappointing results and a potential approach that may have a greater likelihood of defining evidence-based treatment for bronchiectasis.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number293
    Pages (from-to)1-7
    Number of pages7
    JournalF1000Research
    Volume8
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 15 Mar 2019

    Keywords

    • Bronchiectasis
    • Clinical trial
    • Treatment

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
    • General Immunology and Microbiology
    • Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics(all)

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Bronchiectasis insanity: Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this