Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

C-reactive protein modifies lipoprotein(a)-related risk for coronary heart disease: the BiomarCaRE project

  • Natalie Arnold
  • , Christopher Blaum
  • , Alina Goßling
  • , Fabian J. Brunner
  • , Benjamin Bay
  • , Marco M. Ferrario
  • , Paolo Brambilla
  • , Giancarlo Cesana
  • , Valerio Leoni
  • , Luigi Palmieri
  • , Chiara Donfrancesco
  • , Teresa Padró
  • , Jonas Andersson
  • , Pekka Jousilahti
  • , Francisco Ojeda
  • , Tanja Zeller
  • , Allan Linneberg
  • , Stefan Söderberg
  • , Licia Iacoviello
  • , Francesco Gianfagna
  • Susana Sans, Giovanni Veronesi, Barbara Thorand, Annette Peters, Hugh Tunstall-Pedoe, Frank Kee, Veikko Salomaa, Renate B. Schnabel, Kari Kuulasmaa, Stefan Blankenberg, Wolfgang Koenig (Lead / Corresponding author), Christoph Waldeyer, BiomarCaRE investigators

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

    Abstract

    Background and Aims: Recent investigations have suggested an interdependence of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)]-related risk for cardiovascular disease with background inflammatory burden. The aim the present analysis was to investigate whether high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) modulates the association between Lp(a) and coronary heart disease (CHD) in the general population.

    Methods: Data from 71 678 participants from 8 European prospective population-based cohort studies were used (65 661 without/6017 with established CHD at baseline; median follow-up 9.8/13.8 years, respectively). Fine and Gray competing risk-adjusted models were calculated according to accompanying hsCRP concentration (<2 and ≥2 mg/L).

    Results: Among CHD-free individuals, increased Lp(a) levels were associated with incident CHD irrespective of hsCRP concentration: fully adjusted sub-distribution hazard ratios [sHRs (95% confidence interval)] for the highest vs. lowest fifth of Lp(a) distribution were 1.45 (1.23-1.72) and 1.48 (1.23-1.78) for a hsCRP group of <2 and ≥2 mg/L, respectively, with no interaction found between these two biomarkers on CHD risk (Pinteraction = 0.82). In those with established CHD, similar associations were seen only among individuals with hsCRP ≥ 2 mg/L [1.34 (1.03-1.76)], whereas among participants with a hsCRP concentration <2 mg/L, there was no clear association between Lp(a) and future CHD events [1.29 (0.98-1.71)] (highest vs. lowest fifth, fully adjusted models; Pinteraction = 0.024).

    Conclusions: While among CHD-free individuals Lp(a) was significantly associated with incident CHD regardless of hsCRP, in participants with CHD at baseline, Lp(a) was related to recurrent CHD events only in those with residual inflammatory risk. These findings might guide adequate selection of high-risk patients for forthcoming Lp(a)-targeting compounds.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1043-1054
    Number of pages12
    JournalEuropean Heart Journal
    Volume45
    Issue number12
    Early online date18 Jan 2024
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 21 Mar 2024

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Keywords

    • High-sensitive C-reactive protein
    • Lipoprotein(a)
    • General population
    • Coronary heart disease
    • Epidemiology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'C-reactive protein modifies lipoprotein(a)-related risk for coronary heart disease: the BiomarCaRE project'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this