TY - JOUR
T1 - Can scenario-planning support community-based natural resource management? Experiences from three countries in latin america
AU - Waylen, Kerry A.
AU - Martin-Ortega, Julia
AU - Blackstock, Kirsty L.
AU - Brown, Iain
AU - Avendaño Uribe, Bryan E.
AU - Basurto Hernández, Saúl
AU - Bertoni, María Belén
AU - Bustos, M. Lujan
AU - Cruz Bayer, Alejandra Xóchitl
AU - Escalante Semerena, Roberto Ivan
AU - Farah Quijano, Maria Adelaida
AU - Ferrelli, Federico
AU - Fidalgo, Guillermo Luis
AU - Hernández López, Israel
AU - Huamantinco Cisneros, María Andrea
AU - London, Silvia
AU - Maya Vélez, Diana L.
AU - Ocampo-Díaz, Natalia
AU - Ortiz-Guerrero, Cesar E.
AU - Pascale, Juan Carlos
AU - Perillo, Gerardo M.E.
AU - Piccolo, M. Cintia
AU - Pinzón Martínez, Lina N.
AU - Rojas, Mara L.
AU - Scordo, Facundo
AU - Vitale, Valeria
AU - Zilio, Mariana I.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Community-based natural resource management (CBNRM) is a concept critical to managing social-ecological systems but whose implementation needs strengthening. Scenario planning is one approach that may offer benefits relevant to CBNRM but whose potential is not yet well understood. Therefore, we designed, trialed, and evaluated a scenario-planning method intended to support CBNRM in three cases, located in Colombia, Mexico, and Argentina. Implementing scenario planning was judged as worthwhile in all three cases, although aspects of it were challenging to facilitate. The benefits generated were relevant to strengthening CBNRM: encouraging the participation of local people and using their knowledge, enhanced consideration of and adaptation to future change, and supporting the development of systems thinking. Tracing exactly when and how these benefits arose was challenging, but two elements of the method seemed particularly useful. First, using a systematic approach to discuss how drivers of change may affect local social-ecological systems helped to foster systems thinking and identify connections between issues. Second, explicitly focusing on how to use and respond to scenarios helped identify specific practical activities, or “response options,” that would support CBNRM despite the pressures of future change. Discussions about response options also highlighted the need for support by other actors, e.g., policy groups: this raised the question of when and how other actors and other sources of knowledge should be involved in scenario planning, so as to encourage their buy-in to actions identified by the process. We suggest that other CBNRM initiatives may benefit from adapting and applying scenario planning. However, these initiatives should be carefully monitored because further research is required to understand how and when scenario-planning methods may produce benefits, as well as their strengths and weaknesses versus other methods.
AB - Community-based natural resource management (CBNRM) is a concept critical to managing social-ecological systems but whose implementation needs strengthening. Scenario planning is one approach that may offer benefits relevant to CBNRM but whose potential is not yet well understood. Therefore, we designed, trialed, and evaluated a scenario-planning method intended to support CBNRM in three cases, located in Colombia, Mexico, and Argentina. Implementing scenario planning was judged as worthwhile in all three cases, although aspects of it were challenging to facilitate. The benefits generated were relevant to strengthening CBNRM: encouraging the participation of local people and using their knowledge, enhanced consideration of and adaptation to future change, and supporting the development of systems thinking. Tracing exactly when and how these benefits arose was challenging, but two elements of the method seemed particularly useful. First, using a systematic approach to discuss how drivers of change may affect local social-ecological systems helped to foster systems thinking and identify connections between issues. Second, explicitly focusing on how to use and respond to scenarios helped identify specific practical activities, or “response options,” that would support CBNRM despite the pressures of future change. Discussions about response options also highlighted the need for support by other actors, e.g., policy groups: this raised the question of when and how other actors and other sources of knowledge should be involved in scenario planning, so as to encourage their buy-in to actions identified by the process. We suggest that other CBNRM initiatives may benefit from adapting and applying scenario planning. However, these initiatives should be carefully monitored because further research is required to understand how and when scenario-planning methods may produce benefits, as well as their strengths and weaknesses versus other methods.
KW - Argentina
KW - Climate change
KW - Colombia
KW - Community-based conservation
KW - Futures thinking
KW - Mexico
KW - Participation
KW - Scenario methods
KW - Wicked problems
U2 - 10.5751/ES-07926-200428
DO - 10.5751/ES-07926-200428
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84953268624
SN - 1708-3087
VL - 20
JO - Ecology and Society
JF - Ecology and Society
IS - 4
M1 - 28
ER -