TY - JOUR
T1 - Carbon Neutrality Pressure and Strategic Responses
AU - Luqman, Adeel
N1 - Copyright of Academy of Management Journal is the property of Academy of Management and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder’s express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
PY - 2024/8/1
Y1 - 2024/8/1
N2 - In the evolving landscape of corporate sustainability, we address a significant research gap by examining the intricate nuances of carbon neutrality pressure. Through a comprehensive framework, we unveil two dimensions: CSR cheating and carbon-neutral strategic plans. Employing data from 312 respondents and structural equation modeling, we reveal intriguing dynamics. Carbon neutrality pressure prompts both CSR cheating and carbon-neutral strategic planning. While direct links emerge between the latter and carbon neutrality pledges, a moderating force—resource bricolage—enhances the strategic commitment. Surprisingly, the Threat of Losing Competitiveness (TLC) amplifies the connection between carbon neutrality pressure and CSR cheating, while tempering the indirect link between CSR cheating and a firm's carbon-neutral status. Notably, posthoc analysis unveils an inverted U-shaped pattern—indicating that CSR cheating's short-term gains contrast with long-term sustainability concerns. This study advances understanding of corporate sustainability strategies by addressing the intricate interplay between carbon neutrality pressure, CSR behaviors, and strategic commitments.
AB - In the evolving landscape of corporate sustainability, we address a significant research gap by examining the intricate nuances of carbon neutrality pressure. Through a comprehensive framework, we unveil two dimensions: CSR cheating and carbon-neutral strategic plans. Employing data from 312 respondents and structural equation modeling, we reveal intriguing dynamics. Carbon neutrality pressure prompts both CSR cheating and carbon-neutral strategic planning. While direct links emerge between the latter and carbon neutrality pledges, a moderating force—resource bricolage—enhances the strategic commitment. Surprisingly, the Threat of Losing Competitiveness (TLC) amplifies the connection between carbon neutrality pressure and CSR cheating, while tempering the indirect link between CSR cheating and a firm's carbon-neutral status. Notably, posthoc analysis unveils an inverted U-shaped pattern—indicating that CSR cheating's short-term gains contrast with long-term sustainability concerns. This study advances understanding of corporate sustainability strategies by addressing the intricate interplay between carbon neutrality pressure, CSR behaviors, and strategic commitments.
KW - AOM Annual Meeting Proceedings 2024
KW - AOM Chicago 2024
KW - Strategic Management
U2 - 10.5465/AMPROC.2024.15324abstract
DO - 10.5465/AMPROC.2024.15324abstract
M3 - Meeting abstract
SN - 0065-0668
VL - 2024
JO - Academy of Management Proceedings
JF - Academy of Management Proceedings
IS - 1
ER -