Cardiotocography v Doppler auscultation: evidence is not as good as NICE suggests - authors of paper's reply

G J Mires, F L R Williams, P W Howie

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

Access to Document

@article{8f32585c07ce42e782216ee6c3c2f1e5,

title = "Cardiotocography v Doppler auscultation: evidence is not as good as NICE suggests - authors of paper's reply",

author = "Mires, {G J} and Williams, {F L R} and Howie, {P W}",

year = "2002",

month = feb,

day = "23",

doi = "10.1136/bmj.324.7335.482",

language = "English",

volume = "324",

pages = "484--485",

journal = "British Medical Journal",

issn = "0959-535X",

publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group Ltd",

number = "7335",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cardiotocography v Doppler auscultation

T2 - evidence is not as good as NICE suggests - authors of paper's reply

AU - Mires, G J

AU - Williams, F L R

AU - Howie, P W

PY - 2002/2/23

Y1 - 2002/2/23

U2 - 10.1136/bmj.324.7335.482

DO - 10.1136/bmj.324.7335.482

M3 - Letter

SN - 0959-535X

VL - 324

SP - 484

EP - 485

JO - British Medical Journal

JF - British Medical Journal

IS - 7335

ER -