Case commentary to Kwok and ors v Chief Executive in Council and Secretary for Justice, Last instance decision, FACV 9/2020, [2020] HKCFA 42, ILDC 3225 (HK 2020), 21st December 2020, Hong Kong; Court of Final Appeal [HKCFA]

Riccardo Vecellio Segate

Case commentary to Kwok and ors v Chief Executive in Council and Secretary for Justice, Last instance decision, FACV 9/2020, [2020] HKCFA 42, ILDC 3225 (HK 2020), 21st December 2020, Hong Kong; Court of Final Appeal [HKCFA]

Leverhulme Research Centre for Forensic Science

Research output: Contribution to specialist publication › Article

Abstract

Whether the enactment of the Prohibition on Face Covering Regulation in response to protests in 2019 was a proportionate restriction of the rights to liberty and privacy, freedom of expression, and the right of peaceful assembly under the Hong Kong Bill of Rights Ordinance, which had enacted the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

Original language	English
Specialist publication	Oxford Public International Law
Publisher	Oxford University Press
Publication status	Published - 21 Dec 2020

Access to Document

https://opil.ouplaw.com/display/10.1093/law-ildc/3225hk20.case.1/law-ildc-3225hk20

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Case commentary to Kwok and ors v Chief Executive in Council and Secretary for Justice, Last instance decision, FACV 9/2020, [2020] HKCFA 42, ILDC 3225 (HK 2020), 21st December 2020, Hong Kong; Court of Final Appeal [HKCFA]'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@misc{209ad177308f40fd895ac891d1858924,

title = "Case commentary to Kwok and ors v Chief Executive in Council and Secretary for Justice, Last instance decision, FACV 9/2020, [2020] HKCFA 42, ILDC 3225 (HK 2020), 21st December 2020, Hong Kong; Court of Final Appeal [HKCFA]",

abstract = "Whether the enactment of the Prohibition on Face Covering Regulation in response to protests in 2019 was a proportionate restriction of the rights to liberty and privacy, freedom of expression, and the right of peaceful assembly under the Hong Kong Bill of Rights Ordinance, which had enacted the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.",

author = "{Vecellio Segate}, Riccardo",

year = "2020",

month = dec,

day = "21",

language = "English",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

address = "United Kingdom",

}

Case commentary to Kwok and ors v Chief Executive in Council and Secretary for Justice, Last instance decision, FACV 9/2020, [2020] HKCFA 42, ILDC 3225 (HK 2020), 21st December 2020, Hong Kong; Court of Final Appeal [HKCFA]. / Vecellio Segate, Riccardo.
In: Oxford Public International Law , 21.12.2020.

Research output: Contribution to specialist publication › Article

TY - GEN

T1 - Case commentary to Kwok and ors v Chief Executive in Council and Secretary for Justice, Last instance decision, FACV 9/2020, [2020] HKCFA 42, ILDC 3225 (HK 2020), 21st December 2020, Hong Kong; Court of Final Appeal [HKCFA]

AU - Vecellio Segate, Riccardo

PY - 2020/12/21

Y1 - 2020/12/21

N2 - Whether the enactment of the Prohibition on Face Covering Regulation in response to protests in 2019 was a proportionate restriction of the rights to liberty and privacy, freedom of expression, and the right of peaceful assembly under the Hong Kong Bill of Rights Ordinance, which had enacted the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

AB - Whether the enactment of the Prohibition on Face Covering Regulation in response to protests in 2019 was a proportionate restriction of the rights to liberty and privacy, freedom of expression, and the right of peaceful assembly under the Hong Kong Bill of Rights Ordinance, which had enacted the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

M3 - Article

PB - Oxford University Press

ER -