Censored imputation of time to event outcome through survival proximity score method

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

47 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The study recognized the significance of accurately addressing censoring and censored data in survival analysis as well as the possibility of biases if these concepts are not approached with caution by researchers. If censored participants are excluded from the study, the true treatment effect comparison will be inaccurate, resulting in biased study findings. In this context, there is a need for some mechanism to impute and update the status information of those patients who were lost to follow-up before the study’s end and might be due to the study-related causes. In order to resolve this issue, we developed a weighted survival proximity score method by using a weighted propensity scoring system to impute the censored values with the help of the nearest neighbourhood technique and update the survival data. After imputing the censored status in the dataset, conventional survival methods are applied to evaluate the differences in hazard rates with and without applying a survival proximity score method. We found that the proposed method reduces bias and mean square error in various transitions. The goal of this work is to resolve the existing issue of censoring and explain how the survival proximity score method can be adapted to update the censored information of lost-followup individuals for therapeutic arms comparison.
Original languageEnglish
Article number116103
JournalJournal of Computational and Applied Mathematics
Volume451
Early online date22 Jun 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2024

Keywords

  • Multistate model
  • Cox proportional hazard model
  • Censoring
  • Survival proximity score matching
  • Weights
  • Data simulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computational Mathematics
  • Applied Mathematics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Censored imputation of time to event outcome through survival proximity score method'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this