TY - JOUR
T1 - Challenges in assessing the nature of effective collaboration in blended university courses
AU - Ellis, Robert A
AU - Bliuc, Ana-Maria
AU - Han, Feifei
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors report no conflict of interests in conducting this research. The research was approved by the Ethics Committee at the university where the data was collected and was conducted in strict accordance to the rules and guidelines applicable to ethical research practices involving human participants. This work was supported by the Australian Research Council [grant number DP150104163].
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Articles published in the Australasian Journal of Educational Technology (AJET). All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - The ability to collaborate effectively face-to-face and online represents a critical skill for university graduates. However, there are still challenges regarding how to accurately assess this skill through traditional student learning measures. To better understand the nature of effective collaboration of university students in blended courses, the current study drew on the student approaches to learning framework and social network analysis techniques. We examined how student approaches to inquiry, approaches to online learning technologies, perceptions of the blended learning environment, different learning outcomes and configurations of collaboration are related. The methodologies commonly used in student approaches to learning research identified deep and surface approaches to inquiry and technologies, positive and negative perceptions of the integration of the learning environment, and of online workload, which also showed logical alignment with relatively better and poorer academic achievement in the course. Based on approaches, perceptions, and learning outcomes, students were divided into groups orientated towards understanding versus reproducing learning. The social network analysis techniques revealed features of different configurations of collaborations by different groups of students and their choices as to whether and with whom to collaborate during the learning process. Nuanced differences were found amongst different configurations of collaborations.
AB - The ability to collaborate effectively face-to-face and online represents a critical skill for university graduates. However, there are still challenges regarding how to accurately assess this skill through traditional student learning measures. To better understand the nature of effective collaboration of university students in blended courses, the current study drew on the student approaches to learning framework and social network analysis techniques. We examined how student approaches to inquiry, approaches to online learning technologies, perceptions of the blended learning environment, different learning outcomes and configurations of collaboration are related. The methodologies commonly used in student approaches to learning research identified deep and surface approaches to inquiry and technologies, positive and negative perceptions of the integration of the learning environment, and of online workload, which also showed logical alignment with relatively better and poorer academic achievement in the course. Based on approaches, perceptions, and learning outcomes, students were divided into groups orientated towards understanding versus reproducing learning. The social network analysis techniques revealed features of different configurations of collaborations by different groups of students and their choices as to whether and with whom to collaborate during the learning process. Nuanced differences were found amongst different configurations of collaborations.
KW - online learning technologies
KW - social network analysis
KW - collaboration
KW - blended learning
KW - approaches to using online learning technologies
KW - approaches to inquiry
KW - perceptions of the blended learning environment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103309876&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.14742/ajet.5576
DO - 10.14742/ajet.5576
M3 - Article
VL - 37
SP - 1
EP - 14
JO - Australasian Journal of Educational Technology
JF - Australasian Journal of Educational Technology
IS - 1
ER -