Changes in Small Airway Physiology Measured by Impulse Oscillometry in Subjects with Allergic Asthma Following Methacholine and Inhaled Allergen Challenge

Henning Stenberg, Rory Chan, Khalid Abd-Elaziz, Arjen Pelgröm, Karin Lammering, Gerda Kuijper-De Haan, Els Weersink, René Lutter, Aeilko H. Zwinderman, Frans de Jongh, Zuzana Diamant

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Small airway dysfunction (SAD) is associated with impaired asthma control, but small airway physiology is not routinely assessed in clinical practice. Previously, we demonstrated impulse oscillometry (IOS)-defined small airway dysfunction (SAD) in dual responders (DRs) upon bronchoprovocation with various allergens. Aim: To compare lung physiology using spirometry and IOS following bronchoprovocation with methacholine (M) and inhaled house dust mite (HDM) extract in corticosteroid-naïve asthmatic subjects. Methods: Non-smoking, clinically stable HDM-allergic asthmatic subjects (18–55 years, FEV1 > 70% of pred.) underwent an M and inhaled HDM challenge on two separate days. Airway response was measured by IOS and spirometry, until a drop in FEV1 ≥ 20% (PC20) from post-diluent baseline (M), and up to 8 h post-allergen (HDM). Early (EAR) and late asthmatic response (LAR) to HDM were defined as ≥20% and ≥15% fall in FEV1 from post-diluent baseline during 0–3 h and 3–8 h post-challenge, respectively. IOS parameters (Rrs5, Rrs20, Rrs5-20, Xrs5, AX, Fres) were compared between mono-responders (MRs: EAR only) and dual responders (EAR + LAR). Correlations between maximal % change from baseline after the two airway challenges were calculated for both FEV1 and IOS parameters. Results: A total of 47 subjects were included (11 MRs; 36 DRs). FEV1 % predicted did not differ between MR and DR at baseline, but DR had lower median PC20M (0.84 (range 0.07–7.51) vs. MR (2.15 (0.53–11.29)); p = 0.036). During the LAR, DRs had higher IOS values than MRs. For IOS parameters (but not for FEV1), the maximal % change from baseline following M and HDM challenge were correlated. PC20M was inversely correlated with the % change in FEV1 and the % change in Xrs5 during the LAR (r= −0.443; p = 0.0018 and r= −0.389; p = 0.0075, respectively). Conclusions: During HDM-induced LAR, changes in small airway physiology can be non-invasively detected with IOS and are associated with increased airway hyperresponsiveness and changes in small airway physiology during methacholine challenge. DRs have a small airways phenotype, which reflects a more advanced airway disease.
Original languageEnglish
Article number906
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Clinical Medicine
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Jan 2025

Keywords

  • asthma
  • small airways
  • impulse oscillometry
  • lung function
  • methacholine challenge
  • allergen bronchoprovocation test

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Changes in Small Airway Physiology Measured by Impulse Oscillometry in Subjects with Allergic Asthma Following Methacholine and Inhaled Allergen Challenge'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this