Choosing a methodological path: reflections on the constructivist turn

Jenna Breckenridge, Derek Jones, Ian Elliott, Margaret Nicol

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Researchers deciding to use grounded theory are faced with complex decisions regarding which method or version of grounded theory to use: Classic, straussian, feminist or constructivist grounded theory. Particularly for beginning PhD researchers, this can prove challenging given the complexities of the inherent philosophical debates and the ambiguous and conflicting use of grounded theory ‘versions’ within popular literature. The aim of this article is to demystify the differences between classic and constructivist grounded theory, presenting a critique of constructivist grounded theory that is rooted in the learning experiences of the first author as she grappled with differing perspectives during her own PhD research
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalGrounded Theory Review: An International Journal
    Volume11
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2012

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Choosing a methodological path: reflections on the constructivist turn'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this