Choosing landscapes for protection

Comparing expert and public views in Gozo, Malta

Elisabeth Conrad (Lead / Corresponding author), Ioan Fazey, Michael Christie, Charles Galdies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Landscape designations are widely used as a basis for land-use policy and planning decisions, with these often based on technical expert assessments. However, there is limited consideration in the literature of the extent to which such expert-based designations reflect public views. This is relevant when considering the strong emphasis of the European Landscape Convention on ensuring that public perceptions are reflected in landscape decisions. In this study, we use the results of a survey to generate public perception-based landscape character and change maps for the island of Gozo (Malta). We consider three different respondent sub-groups and evaluate the degree of concordance between results obtained and landscapes recommended for designation by experts. Results indicate a poor fit between expert-based and public-based results, with >70% of expert-recommended areas not considered to be of particularly high landscape character by the public, and conversely, with >50% of areas considered to be of high character by the public not included within areas identified by experts as meriting protection. The spatial distribution of these areas was also poorly correlated. Furthermore, clear differences between public and technical judgements of landscape change were evident, particularly in the case of urban landscapes. The study has important implications, showing that expert-based landscape designations may not accurately or adequately reflect public views on valued landscapes and suggesting the need for additional public input to inform decision-making. Our results also indicate the importance of adopting comprehensive protection, planning and management approaches that consider not only outstanding but also more everyday landscapes.

Original languageEnglish
Article number103621
Pages (from-to)1-15
Number of pages15
JournalLandscape and Urban Planning
Volume191
Early online date3 Aug 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 3 Aug 2019

Fingerprint

public
landscape change
decision making
spatial distribution
land use
decision
planning
need
convention
policy
urban landscape

Keywords

  • European Landscape Convention
  • Landscape change
  • Landscape character
  • Landscape planning
  • Mapping

Cite this

Conrad, E., Fazey, I., Christie, M., & Galdies, C. (2019). Choosing landscapes for protection: Comparing expert and public views in Gozo, Malta. Landscape and Urban Planning, 191, 1-15. [103621]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103621
Conrad, Elisabeth ; Fazey, Ioan ; Christie, Michael ; Galdies, Charles. / Choosing landscapes for protection : Comparing expert and public views in Gozo, Malta. In: Landscape and Urban Planning. 2019 ; Vol. 191. pp. 1-15.
@article{8391045038424ae390c4afceb5dbb972,
title = "Choosing landscapes for protection: Comparing expert and public views in Gozo, Malta",
abstract = "Landscape designations are widely used as a basis for land-use policy and planning decisions, with these often based on technical expert assessments. However, there is limited consideration in the literature of the extent to which such expert-based designations reflect public views. This is relevant when considering the strong emphasis of the European Landscape Convention on ensuring that public perceptions are reflected in landscape decisions. In this study, we use the results of a survey to generate public perception-based landscape character and change maps for the island of Gozo (Malta). We consider three different respondent sub-groups and evaluate the degree of concordance between results obtained and landscapes recommended for designation by experts. Results indicate a poor fit between expert-based and public-based results, with >70{\%} of expert-recommended areas not considered to be of particularly high landscape character by the public, and conversely, with >50{\%} of areas considered to be of high character by the public not included within areas identified by experts as meriting protection. The spatial distribution of these areas was also poorly correlated. Furthermore, clear differences between public and technical judgements of landscape change were evident, particularly in the case of urban landscapes. The study has important implications, showing that expert-based landscape designations may not accurately or adequately reflect public views on valued landscapes and suggesting the need for additional public input to inform decision-making. Our results also indicate the importance of adopting comprehensive protection, planning and management approaches that consider not only outstanding but also more everyday landscapes.",
keywords = "European Landscape Convention, Landscape change, Landscape character, Landscape planning, Mapping",
author = "Elisabeth Conrad and Ioan Fazey and Michael Christie and Charles Galdies",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103621",
language = "English",
volume = "191",
pages = "1--15",

}

Conrad, E, Fazey, I, Christie, M & Galdies, C 2019, 'Choosing landscapes for protection: Comparing expert and public views in Gozo, Malta', Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 191, 103621, pp. 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103621

Choosing landscapes for protection : Comparing expert and public views in Gozo, Malta. / Conrad, Elisabeth (Lead / Corresponding author); Fazey, Ioan; Christie, Michael; Galdies, Charles.

In: Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 191, 103621, 11.2019, p. 1-15.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Choosing landscapes for protection

T2 - Comparing expert and public views in Gozo, Malta

AU - Conrad, Elisabeth

AU - Fazey, Ioan

AU - Christie, Michael

AU - Galdies, Charles

PY - 2019/8/3

Y1 - 2019/8/3

N2 - Landscape designations are widely used as a basis for land-use policy and planning decisions, with these often based on technical expert assessments. However, there is limited consideration in the literature of the extent to which such expert-based designations reflect public views. This is relevant when considering the strong emphasis of the European Landscape Convention on ensuring that public perceptions are reflected in landscape decisions. In this study, we use the results of a survey to generate public perception-based landscape character and change maps for the island of Gozo (Malta). We consider three different respondent sub-groups and evaluate the degree of concordance between results obtained and landscapes recommended for designation by experts. Results indicate a poor fit between expert-based and public-based results, with >70% of expert-recommended areas not considered to be of particularly high landscape character by the public, and conversely, with >50% of areas considered to be of high character by the public not included within areas identified by experts as meriting protection. The spatial distribution of these areas was also poorly correlated. Furthermore, clear differences between public and technical judgements of landscape change were evident, particularly in the case of urban landscapes. The study has important implications, showing that expert-based landscape designations may not accurately or adequately reflect public views on valued landscapes and suggesting the need for additional public input to inform decision-making. Our results also indicate the importance of adopting comprehensive protection, planning and management approaches that consider not only outstanding but also more everyday landscapes.

AB - Landscape designations are widely used as a basis for land-use policy and planning decisions, with these often based on technical expert assessments. However, there is limited consideration in the literature of the extent to which such expert-based designations reflect public views. This is relevant when considering the strong emphasis of the European Landscape Convention on ensuring that public perceptions are reflected in landscape decisions. In this study, we use the results of a survey to generate public perception-based landscape character and change maps for the island of Gozo (Malta). We consider three different respondent sub-groups and evaluate the degree of concordance between results obtained and landscapes recommended for designation by experts. Results indicate a poor fit between expert-based and public-based results, with >70% of expert-recommended areas not considered to be of particularly high landscape character by the public, and conversely, with >50% of areas considered to be of high character by the public not included within areas identified by experts as meriting protection. The spatial distribution of these areas was also poorly correlated. Furthermore, clear differences between public and technical judgements of landscape change were evident, particularly in the case of urban landscapes. The study has important implications, showing that expert-based landscape designations may not accurately or adequately reflect public views on valued landscapes and suggesting the need for additional public input to inform decision-making. Our results also indicate the importance of adopting comprehensive protection, planning and management approaches that consider not only outstanding but also more everyday landscapes.

KW - European Landscape Convention

KW - Landscape change

KW - Landscape character

KW - Landscape planning

KW - Mapping

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070064760&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103621

DO - 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103621

M3 - Article

VL - 191

SP - 1

EP - 15

M1 - 103621

ER -