Chronic morbidity, deprivation and primary medical care spending in England in 2015-16: a cross-sectional spatial analysis

Evangelos Kontopantelis (Lead / Corresponding author), Mamas A. Mamas, Harm van Marwijk, Andrew M. Ryan, Peter Bower, Bruce Guthrie, Tim Doran

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    8 Citations (Scopus)
    180 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Background: Primary care provides the foundation for most modern health-care systems, and in the interests of equity, it should be resourced according to local need. We aimed to describe spatially the burden of chronic conditions and primary medical care funding in England at a low geographical level, and to measure how much variation in funding is explained by chronic condition prevalence and other patient and regional factors.

    Methods: We used multiple administrative data sets including chronic condition prevalence and management data (2014/15), funding for primary-care practices (2015-16), and geographical and area deprivation data (2015). Data were assigned to a low geographical level (average 1500 residents). We investigated the overall morbidity burden across 19 chronic conditions and its regional variation, spatial clustering and association with funding and area deprivation. A linear regression model was used to explain local variation in spending using patient demographics, morbidity, deprivation and regional characteristics.

    Results: Levels of morbidity varied within and between regions, with several clusters of very high morbidity identified. At the regional level, morbidity was modestly associated with practice funding, with the North East and North West appearing underfunded. The regression model explained 39% of the variability in practice funding, but even after adjusting for covariates, a large amount of variability in funding existed across regions. High morbidity and, especially, rural location were very strongly associated with higher practice funding, while associations were more modest for high deprivation and older age.

    Conclusions: Primary care funding in England does not adequately reflect the contemporary morbidity burden. More equitable resource allocation could be achieved by making better use of routinely available information and big data resources. Similar methods could be deployed in other countries where comparable data are collected, to identify morbidity clusters and to target funding to areas of greater need.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number19
    Pages (from-to)1-13
    Number of pages13
    JournalBMC Medicine
    Volume16
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 14 Feb 2018

    Keywords

    • Carr-Hill formula
    • Chronic conditions
    • Deprivation
    • England
    • Global sum allocation formula
    • Morbidity
    • Primary care funding
    • QOF
    • Quality and Outcomes Framework
    • Spatial clustering
    • UK

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Chronic morbidity, deprivation and primary medical care spending in England in 2015-16: a cross-sectional spatial analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this