Abstract
This commentary considers the paper by Furley and Memmert (2010) who sought to test the respective validities of the specific processing and cognitive adaptation hypotheses. That they found no evidence of a difference between experienced basketball players and nonathletes on the Corsi block task, a measure of spatial memory, led them to infer support for the specific processing hypothesis, namely that differences between experts and novices manifest themselves only in processes related specifically to the domain of expertise. An alternative interpretation is offered, indicating possible confounds and referring to recent research that suggests Corsi block and dynamic spatial tasks depend upon different neuronal networks.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 243-246 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | Perceptual and Motor Skills |
Volume | 112 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs |
|
Publication status | Published - 2011 |
Keywords
- MULTIPLE-OBJECT TRACKING
- TASK
- TARGET TRACKING
- CHILDREN
- EXPERTISE
- ENUMERATION
- INSIGHT