Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Collection and determinants of patient reported outcome measures in haemodialysis patients in Scotland

  • A. Nimmo (Lead / Corresponding author)
  • , S. Bell
  • , C. Brunton
  • , J. Campbell
  • , A. Doyle
  • , B. Mackinnon
  • , R. K. Peel
  • , S. Robertson
  • , I. Shilliday
  • , E. Spalding
  • , J. P. Traynor
  • , W. Metcalfe
  • , The Scottish Renal Registry (SRR)

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    232 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Background: Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) can evaluate the quality of health in patients with established renal failure. There is limited experience of their use within national renal registries.

    Aim: To describe the Scottish Renal Registry’s (SRR) experience of collecting PROMS in the haemodialysis population and correlate PROMS to demographic and clinical parameters.

    Design: Retrospective observational cross-sectional study.

    Methods: Haemodialysis patients in Scotland were invited to complete the KDQOL™-36 questionnaire on the day of the annual SRR census in 2015 and 2016. Questionnaires were linked to census demographic and clinical variables.

    Results: In 2016 738 questionnaires were linked to census data (39% of prevalent haemodialysis population). Response rates differed with age (≥ 65 years 42%, < 65 years 36%) [χ2 p=0.006]; duration of renal replacement therapy (<1 year 46%, ≥1 < 5 years 38%, ≥ 5 years 33%) [χ2 p=0.002] and social class (Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) Class 1 32%, Class 2 41%, Class 3 40%, Class 4 48%, Class 5 40%) [χ2 p<0.001]. There were significant differences in PROMs with age, SIMD quintile and primary renal diagnosis. Achieving a urea reduction ratio of >65% and dialysing through arteriovenous access were associated with significantly higher PROMs. PROMs were not affected by haemoglobin or phosphate concentration.

    Conclusions: Routine collection of PROMs is feasible and can identify potentially under-recognised and treatable determinants to quality of life. The association between attaining recommended standards of care and improved PROMs is striking. Individual and population-wide strategies are required to improve PROMs.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)15-21
    Number of pages7
    JournalQJM : an International Journal of Medicine
    Volume111
    Issue number1
    Early online date18 Sept 2017
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2018

    Keywords

    • Hemodialysis
    • Hemoglobin
    • Censuses
    • Demography
    • Phosphates
    • Scotland
    • Kidney
    • Urea reduction ratio
    • Patient reported outcome measures
    • Age Distribution
    • Prevalence
    • Humans
    • Middle Aged
    • Male
    • Scotland
    • Young Adult
    • Renal Dialysis/statistics & numerical data
    • Adult
    • Female
    • Registries
    • Renal Insufficiency/therapy
    • Surveys and Questionnaires
    • Retrospective Studies
    • Patient Reported Outcome Measures
    • Cross-Sectional Studies
    • Analysis of Variance
    • Adolescent
    • Quality of Life
    • Sex Distribution
    • Aged

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • General Medicine

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Collection and determinants of patient reported outcome measures in haemodialysis patients in Scotland'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this