Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Combined large and small airway obstruction is associated with increased exacerbation frequency and poorer symptom control in persistent asthma

  • Samruddhi Lele
  • , Anu Pillai
  • , Musab Quayum
  • , Michael E. Wechsler
  • , Praveen Akuthota
  • , Ronald J. Dandurand
  • , Richard Hammond
  • , Atanu Bhattacharjee
  • , Francesco Menzella
  • , Remo Poto
  • , Pasquale Comberiati
  • , Alvise Berti
  • , Carlo Lombardi
  • , Stanley P. Galant
  • , Ophir Freund
  • , Laura Ventura
  • , Andrea Portacci
  • , Giovanna Elisiana Carpagnano
  • , Valeria Ortolani
  • , Brian Lipworth
  • Salman Siddiqui, Marcello Cottini, Rory Chan (Lead / Corresponding author)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background
Spirometry remains central to the assessment of asthma but may fail to detect small airways dysfunction (SAD), which contributes to considerable symptoms and exacerbation risk.

Objective
We investigated whether integrating oscillometry with spirometry improves physiological phenotyping and risk stratification in asthma.

Methods
In this retrospective multicentre study, data from 1,497 adults with asthma were analysed from the Oscillometry Asthma Registry (OAR). SAD was defined using the (Rrs5-20)/Rrs5 ratio ≥19%, and airflow obstruction as FEV1/FVC <70%. Participants were categorised into four mutually exclusive groups: (a) Group 1 - normal oscillometry and normal spirometry; (b) Group 2 - abnormal oscillometry with normal spirometry; (c) Group 3 - normal oscillometry with abnormal spirometry; and (d) Group 4 - abnormal oscillometry and abnormal spirometry. Associations with symptom control, exacerbations, and type 2 inflammatory biomarkers were assessed using multivariable logistic regression.

Results
For ≥1 exacerbation, the adjusted odds ratio (aORs) (95%CI) for Group 4 were: versus Group 1 3.19 (2.31,4.42); versus Group 2 1.99 (1.46,2.74); and versus Group 3 1.59 (1.07;2.37). Corresponding aOR values for Group 3 were: versus Group 2 1.26 (0.85,1.86); and versus Group 1 2.01 (1.37;2.94). The aOR for ≥1 exacerbation for Group 2 versus Group 1 was 1.60 (1.18,2.16). Results were similar when using FEV1/FVC <LLN instead of traditional predicted values.

Conclusion
The combined use of oscillometry and spirometry identifies distinct physiological phenotypes of asthma with clinically meaningful differences in symptom burden and exacerbation risk.
Original languageEnglish
JournalThe Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
Early online date7 Jul 2026
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 7 Jul 2026

Keywords

  • asthma
  • exacerbations
  • oscillometry
  • spirometry
  • symptoms

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Combined large and small airway obstruction is associated with increased exacerbation frequency and poorer symptom control in persistent asthma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this