TY - JOUR
T1 - Comment on "mt-Keima detects PINK1-PRKN mitophagy in vivo with greater sensitivity than mito-QC"
AU - Ganley, Ian G.
AU - Whitworth, Alexander J.
AU - McWilliams, Thomas G.
N1 - This work was supported by a grant from the Medical Research Council UK (IGG: MC_UU_00018/2; AJW: MC_UU_00015/6). Research in TGM lab is funded by the Academy of Finland, Novo Nordisk Foundation, Sigrid Jusélius Foundation, Sydäntutkimussäätiö and the University of Helsinki.
PY - 2021/12/2
Y1 - 2021/12/2
N2 - The generation of pH-sensitive fluorescent probes to monitor autophagy has greatly advanced our understanding of autophagic flux. In particular, genetically encoding these probes within model organisms has expanded our appreciation of the complexities of physiological autophagy. Reporter probes localize to distinct cellular components, allowing tractable and robust monitoring of general or specific autophagy pathways. Though the principle upon which they operate is similar, each reporter system exhibits subtle differences in the information they report. As with every tool or reagent, each has inherent advantages and disadvantages. These differences are a function of the composition and configuration of each probe, such as the type of fluorescent protein used or the mode in which they localize to a specific organelle. Here, we would like to comment on a recent article comparing the mitophagy reporters mt-Keima and mito-QC.
AB - The generation of pH-sensitive fluorescent probes to monitor autophagy has greatly advanced our understanding of autophagic flux. In particular, genetically encoding these probes within model organisms has expanded our appreciation of the complexities of physiological autophagy. Reporter probes localize to distinct cellular components, allowing tractable and robust monitoring of general or specific autophagy pathways. Though the principle upon which they operate is similar, each reporter system exhibits subtle differences in the information they report. As with every tool or reagent, each has inherent advantages and disadvantages. These differences are a function of the composition and configuration of each probe, such as the type of fluorescent protein used or the mode in which they localize to a specific organelle. Here, we would like to comment on a recent article comparing the mitophagy reporters mt-Keima and mito-QC.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103637839&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/15548627.2021.1907269
DO - 10.1080/15548627.2021.1907269
M3 - Article
C2 - 33818280
SN - 1554-8627
VL - 17
SP - 4477
EP - 4479
JO - Autophagy
JF - Autophagy
IS - 12
ER -