TY - JOUR
T1 - Communicating patron rights and responsibilities transparently
T2 - creating a model internet acceptable use policy for uk public libraries
AU - Robinson, Elaine
AU - McMenemy, David
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Economic and Social Research Council [ES/J500136/1].
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Facilitating access to the Internet is an important part of the public library mission, and is crucial in ensuring that all citizens have the possibility of access to contemporary digital information and public services. Part of managing this access relies on the Acceptable Use Policy (AUP), an agreement between the library and the user regarding the conditions of access. This article reports on a national UK study of public library AUPs and the development of a new national model policy for public libraries, and which can be considered as ‘best practice’. The article reports analysis of AUPs across the UK, with specific focus on how they communicate the use of filtering, and surveillance. This research adds new insight by studying the content of AUPs and contributes to the limited research that exists on public library AUPs in the UK. The research analyzed AUPs from 205 authorities in the UK, a return rate of 99.5%. The resulting conclusions and synthesis of relevant guidance on AUPs led to the formation of the model policy presented in this article.
AB - Facilitating access to the Internet is an important part of the public library mission, and is crucial in ensuring that all citizens have the possibility of access to contemporary digital information and public services. Part of managing this access relies on the Acceptable Use Policy (AUP), an agreement between the library and the user regarding the conditions of access. This article reports on a national UK study of public library AUPs and the development of a new national model policy for public libraries, and which can be considered as ‘best practice’. The article reports analysis of AUPs across the UK, with specific focus on how they communicate the use of filtering, and surveillance. This research adds new insight by studying the content of AUPs and contributes to the limited research that exists on public library AUPs in the UK. The research analyzed AUPs from 205 authorities in the UK, a return rate of 99.5%. The resulting conclusions and synthesis of relevant guidance on AUPs led to the formation of the model policy presented in this article.
KW - acceptable use policy
KW - filtering
KW - Public libraries
KW - qualitative content analysis
KW - surveillance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85110002148&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/01616846.2021.1936883
DO - 10.1080/01616846.2021.1936883
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85110002148
SN - 0161-6846
VL - 41
SP - 381
EP - 405
JO - Public Library Quarterly
JF - Public Library Quarterly
IS - 4
ER -