Comparative evaluation of open-source and proprietary software for ARDL, EC models, and bounds test for cointegration

Kleanthis Natsiopoulos, Nickolaos Tzeremes

Research output: Contribution to conferenceAbstractpeer-review

Abstract

The Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) and Error Correction (EC) models are widely used in time-series econometrics, particularly for analyzing level (cointegrating) relationships between variables in the presence of mixed levels of integration. Since its release, the ARDL package for R has become a reliable and versatile tool for implementing these models, offering an intuitive framework for estimating ARDL and EC models, automatically selecting optimal lags and conducting bounds tests for cointegration. The package also provides seamless integration with other R packages for post-estimation diagnostics, further enhancing its utility for applied econometric analysis. Additionally, a proof-of-concept (PoC) comparison of the ARDL package with other open-source R packages and proprietary software (EViews, Stata) is presented. The ARDL package demonstrates accurate and consistent results, surpassing other open-source alternatives and offering several advantages over proprietary tools, such as exact sample critical values and additional model representations. The comparison uses the original data from the seminal bounds test paper.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 15 Dec 2024
EventInternational Joint Conference CFE-CMStatistics - King's College London, London, United Kingdom
Duration: 14 Dec 202416 Dec 2024
Conference number: 18
https://www.cmstatistics.org/CFECMStatistics2024/index.php

Conference

ConferenceInternational Joint Conference CFE-CMStatistics
Abbreviated titleCFE-CMStatistics 2024
Country/TerritoryUnited Kingdom
CityLondon
Period14/12/2416/12/24
Internet address

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative evaluation of open-source and proprietary software for ARDL, EC models, and bounds test for cointegration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this