Comparative study of corneal strip extensometry and inflation tests

Ahmed Elsheikh, Kevin Anderson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    125 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Strip extensometry tests are usually considered less reliable than trephinate inflation tests in studying corneal biomechanics. In spite of the evident simplicity of strip extensometry tests, several earlier studies preferred inflation tests in determining the constitutive relationship of the cornea and its other material properties, such as Young's modulus and the hysteresis behaviour. In this research, the deficiencies of the strip tests are discussed and a mathematical procedure presented to take account of these deficiencies when obtaining the corneal material properties. The study also involves testing 10 pairs of porcine corneas using both strip extensometry and trephinate inflation techniques and the results are subjected to mathematical back analysis in order to determine the stress–strain behaviour. The behaviour obtained from the strip extensometry tests and using the new mathematical analysis procedure is shown to match closely the inflation test results.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)177-185
    Number of pages9
    JournalJournal of the Royal Society Interface
    Volume2
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2005

    Fingerprint

    Economic Inflation
    Materials properties
    Biomechanics
    Cornea
    Hysteresis
    Elastic moduli
    Elastic Modulus
    Testing
    Biomechanical Phenomena
    Swine
    Research

    Keywords

    • Corneal biomechanics
    • Strip extensometry
    • Trephinate inflation

    Cite this

    Elsheikh, Ahmed ; Anderson, Kevin. / Comparative study of corneal strip extensometry and inflation tests. In: Journal of the Royal Society Interface. 2005 ; Vol. 2, No. 3. pp. 177-185.
    @article{e03bdefa3a5542a5b19de80b46faf735,
    title = "Comparative study of corneal strip extensometry and inflation tests",
    abstract = "Strip extensometry tests are usually considered less reliable than trephinate inflation tests in studying corneal biomechanics. In spite of the evident simplicity of strip extensometry tests, several earlier studies preferred inflation tests in determining the constitutive relationship of the cornea and its other material properties, such as Young's modulus and the hysteresis behaviour. In this research, the deficiencies of the strip tests are discussed and a mathematical procedure presented to take account of these deficiencies when obtaining the corneal material properties. The study also involves testing 10 pairs of porcine corneas using both strip extensometry and trephinate inflation techniques and the results are subjected to mathematical back analysis in order to determine the stress–strain behaviour. The behaviour obtained from the strip extensometry tests and using the new mathematical analysis procedure is shown to match closely the inflation test results.",
    keywords = "Corneal biomechanics, Strip extensometry, Trephinate inflation",
    author = "Ahmed Elsheikh and Kevin Anderson",
    note = "dc.publisher: The Royal Society",
    year = "2005",
    doi = "10.1098/rsif.2005.0034",
    language = "English",
    volume = "2",
    pages = "177--185",
    journal = "Journal of the Royal Society Interface",
    issn = "1742-5689",
    publisher = "The Royal Society",
    number = "3",

    }

    Comparative study of corneal strip extensometry and inflation tests. / Elsheikh, Ahmed; Anderson, Kevin.

    In: Journal of the Royal Society Interface, Vol. 2, No. 3, 2005, p. 177-185.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Comparative study of corneal strip extensometry and inflation tests

    AU - Elsheikh, Ahmed

    AU - Anderson, Kevin

    N1 - dc.publisher: The Royal Society

    PY - 2005

    Y1 - 2005

    N2 - Strip extensometry tests are usually considered less reliable than trephinate inflation tests in studying corneal biomechanics. In spite of the evident simplicity of strip extensometry tests, several earlier studies preferred inflation tests in determining the constitutive relationship of the cornea and its other material properties, such as Young's modulus and the hysteresis behaviour. In this research, the deficiencies of the strip tests are discussed and a mathematical procedure presented to take account of these deficiencies when obtaining the corneal material properties. The study also involves testing 10 pairs of porcine corneas using both strip extensometry and trephinate inflation techniques and the results are subjected to mathematical back analysis in order to determine the stress–strain behaviour. The behaviour obtained from the strip extensometry tests and using the new mathematical analysis procedure is shown to match closely the inflation test results.

    AB - Strip extensometry tests are usually considered less reliable than trephinate inflation tests in studying corneal biomechanics. In spite of the evident simplicity of strip extensometry tests, several earlier studies preferred inflation tests in determining the constitutive relationship of the cornea and its other material properties, such as Young's modulus and the hysteresis behaviour. In this research, the deficiencies of the strip tests are discussed and a mathematical procedure presented to take account of these deficiencies when obtaining the corneal material properties. The study also involves testing 10 pairs of porcine corneas using both strip extensometry and trephinate inflation techniques and the results are subjected to mathematical back analysis in order to determine the stress–strain behaviour. The behaviour obtained from the strip extensometry tests and using the new mathematical analysis procedure is shown to match closely the inflation test results.

    KW - Corneal biomechanics

    KW - Strip extensometry

    KW - Trephinate inflation

    U2 - 10.1098/rsif.2005.0034

    DO - 10.1098/rsif.2005.0034

    M3 - Article

    VL - 2

    SP - 177

    EP - 185

    JO - Journal of the Royal Society Interface

    JF - Journal of the Royal Society Interface

    SN - 1742-5689

    IS - 3

    ER -