Comparing social group identifications and socioeconomic deprivation as predictors of psychological distress: Evidence from a Scottish primary care sample

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing social group identifications and socioeconomic deprivation as predictors of psychological distress

T2 - Evidence from a Scottish primary care sample

AU - Cientanni, Fabia

AU - Power, Kevin

AU - Sani, Fabio

AU - Wright, Christopher

AU - Baty, Frances

AU - Hustings, Kerry

AU - Morgan, David

AU - Tanner, Gary

N1 - Funding: European Commission. Grant Number: 621000.

PY - 2017/12/2

Y1 - 2017/12/2

N2 - Social group identification and socioeconomic deprivation have both been linked to self-reported depressive symptomology in general population samples; however no study to date has explored the strength of the joint predictive value of these factors within a mental health population. The current study explores the impact of social group identifications and socioeconomic deprivation, together with important clinical and demographic variables, on psychological distress in a Scottish mental health sample. Participants (N = 976) were recruited from referrals to a computerised Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (cCBT) programme in Scotland, ‘Beating the Blues’ (BtB) over a 25-month period. Participants completed the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) as a measure of psychological distress and three versions of the group identifications scale (GIS), one for each of three groups: family, community, and a social group of choice. Demographic and clinical information were collected on commencing BtB. Higher numbers of group identifications were significantly associated with lower psychological distress. Additionally, increased socioeconomic deprivation was significantly associated with more severe psychological distress, however interestingly the association was not as strong as that of group identifications. Identifying with fewer social groups predicts more severe psychological symptom presentations, even more so than living in a greater state of socioeconomic deprivation.

AB - Social group identification and socioeconomic deprivation have both been linked to self-reported depressive symptomology in general population samples; however no study to date has explored the strength of the joint predictive value of these factors within a mental health population. The current study explores the impact of social group identifications and socioeconomic deprivation, together with important clinical and demographic variables, on psychological distress in a Scottish mental health sample. Participants (N = 976) were recruited from referrals to a computerised Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (cCBT) programme in Scotland, ‘Beating the Blues’ (BtB) over a 25-month period. Participants completed the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) as a measure of psychological distress and three versions of the group identifications scale (GIS), one for each of three groups: family, community, and a social group of choice. Demographic and clinical information were collected on commencing BtB. Higher numbers of group identifications were significantly associated with lower psychological distress. Additionally, increased socioeconomic deprivation was significantly associated with more severe psychological distress, however interestingly the association was not as strong as that of group identifications. Identifying with fewer social groups predicts more severe psychological symptom presentations, even more so than living in a greater state of socioeconomic deprivation.

KW - psychological distress

KW - psychological symptom severity

KW - social group identifications

KW - socioeconomic deprivation

U2 - 10.1111/bjso.12210

DO - 10.1111/bjso.12210

M3 - Article

C2 - 28741679

SN - 0144-6665

VL - 56

SP - 705

EP - 722

JO - British Journal of Social Psychology

JF - British Journal of Social Psychology

IS - 4

ER -