Comparison of 0.25% S(-)-bupivacaine with 0.25% RS-bupivacaine for epidural analgesia in labour

D. Burke, D. J. Henderson, A. M. Simpson, K. A. Faccenda, L. M. Morrison, E. M. McGrady, G. A. McLeod, J. Bannister

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    48 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    We have compared the efficacy of 0.25% S(-)-bupivacaine with 0.25% RS-bupivacaine in providing epidural analgesia for labour in a randomized, multicentre, double-blind study. Analgesia was initiated with 10 ml of the study solution and maintained with 10-ml top-ups. We studied 137 women and treatments were found to be equivalent for onset, duration and quality of block. Median onset of pain relief was 12 min for both drugs and median duration was 49 (range 3-129) min and 51 (7-157) min for S(-)-bupivacaine and RS bupivacaine, respectively. The estimated treatment difference for duration of pain relief was -4 (90% CI -13, 6) min. Thirty patients failed to achieve pain relief after the first injection (20 patients after S(-)-bupivacaine and 10 after RS-bupivacaine; P = 0.039). However, median duration of pain relief from the first top-up was 82 (range 3-164) min for S(-)-bupivacaine and 76 (22-221) min for RS-bupivacaine. There were no significant differences in the quality of analgesia, as assessed by the investigators. There were no significant differences in the extent of sensory block, percentage of patients with motor block or incidence of adverse events.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)750-755
    Number of pages6
    JournalBritish Journal of Anaesthesia
    Volume83
    Issue number5
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 1999

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of 0.25% S(-)-bupivacaine with 0.25% RS-bupivacaine for epidural analgesia in labour'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this