Comparison of AC and DC constant photocurrent methods for determination of defect densities

C. Main, S. Reynolds, I. Zrinscak, A. Merazga

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    19 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    We propose an explanation for large discrepancies in the absorption spectrum of a-Si:H between measurements by DC and AC constant photocurrent methods (CPM). DC measurement gives a consistently higher value for the absorption coefficient a at low photon energies. A small-signal analysis of the photoconductive response to modulated sub-gap illumination reveals low frequency poles associated with thermal emission processes, which explain this discrepancy. We demonstrate with computer simulations that while DC CPM, which includes these transitions, gives a more accurate value for absorption, AC CPM provides a more accurate means of determining the distribution of occupied gap-states. Further, we show that combining DC and AC methods allows determination of the distribution of deep unoccupied gap-states. These concepts are applied to experimental results for several undoped a-Si:H films.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)228-231
    Number of pages4
    JournalJournal of Non-Crystalline Solids
    Volume338
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2004

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of AC and DC constant photocurrent methods for determination of defect densities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this