Comparison of atrial natriuretic peptide B-type natriuretic peptide, and N-terminal proatrial natriuretic peptide as indicators of left ventricular systolic dysfunction

Neil C. Davidson, Abdelwahab A. Naas, Jacqueline K. Hanson, Norman S. J. Kennedy, Wendy J. Coutie, Allan D. Struthers

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    186 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    We have directly compared atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), and N-terminal pro-ANP (N-ANP) as markers of patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <or = 35%, as measured by radionuclide ventriculography. Venous blood samples were obtained from an unselected group of 87 patients who had been referred for assessment of ventricular function. ANP, BNP, and N-ANP were measured by radioimmunoassay using commercial kits. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis was used for the objective assessment of the diagnostic performance of each assay. There was a weak negative correlation between LVEF and plasma levels of ANP-li (r = -0.50,), BNP-li (r = -0.57), and N-ANP-li (r = -0.49) (p 4 pmol/L-sensitivity 1.0, specificity 0.58; N-ANP >200 pmol/L-sensitivity 0.95, specificity 0.35; and ANP >10 pmol/L-sensitivity 0.90, specificity 0.30. Plasma concentrations of BNP and N-ANP provide sensitive indicators of moderate to severe LV dysfunction; both peptides, are objectively superior to ANP for identifying patients with LVEF <or = 35%. These simple tests could be used to screen patients with suspected ventricular dysfunction to reduce the demand for further cardiac investigations.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)828-831
    Number of pages4
    JournalAmerican Journal of Cardiology
    Volume77
    Issue number10
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 15 Apr 1996

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of atrial natriuretic peptide B-type natriuretic peptide, and N-terminal proatrial natriuretic peptide as indicators of left ventricular systolic dysfunction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this