Comparison of swabbing and cutting-out DNA collection methods from cotton, paper, and cardboard surfaces

Agnieszka Kuffel (Lead / Corresponding author), Niamh Nic Daeid, Alexander Gray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
190 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Choosing an inappropriate method of sample collection can often have a detrimental impact on DNA recovery. Multiple studies highlight the importance of selecting the recovery method based on the type of surface the DNA sample is located on. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of sample collection via the single cotton swabbing method in comparison to recovery directly from the material cut from the surface. The three types of surfaces included cotton, paper, and cardboard. DNA sources comprised cell-free and cellular DNA, as well as blood and saliva as examples of body fluids commonly encountered at crime scenes. The data analysis revealed that the cutting-out method resulted in higher DNA recovery from all but cardboard surfaces, making it the more efficient collection method. Despite its limitations, the cutting-out method should be considered as the DNA recovery method of choice when suitable.
Original languageEnglish
Article number100453
Number of pages10
JournalForensic Science International: Synergy
Volume8
Early online date1 Jan 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Keywords

  • DNA recovery
  • DNA collection
  • Sampling
  • Direct DNA extraction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of swabbing and cutting-out DNA collection methods from cotton, paper, and cardboard surfaces'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this