Projects per year
Abstract
Choosing an inappropriate method of sample collection can often have a detrimental impact on DNA recovery. Multiple studies highlight the importance of selecting the recovery method based on the type of surface the DNA sample is located on. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of sample collection via the single cotton swabbing method in comparison to recovery directly from the material cut from the surface. The three types of surfaces included cotton, paper, and cardboard. DNA sources comprised cell-free and cellular DNA, as well as blood and saliva as examples of body fluids commonly encountered at crime scenes. The data analysis revealed that the cutting-out method resulted in higher DNA recovery from all but cardboard surfaces, making it the more efficient collection method. Despite its limitations, the cutting-out method should be considered as the DNA recovery method of choice when suitable.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 100453 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Forensic Science International: Synergy |
Volume | 8 |
Early online date | 1 Jan 2024 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2024 |
Keywords
- DNA recovery
- DNA collection
- Sampling
- Direct DNA extraction
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Law
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of swabbing and cutting-out DNA collection methods from cotton, paper, and cardboard surfaces'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 1 Active
-
Leverhulme Research Centre for Forensic Science (LRCFS)
Nic Daeid, N. (Investigator)
1/07/16 → 30/06/26
Project: Research