Compensating for severe nuclear accidents: An expert elucidation

William J. Nuttall (Lead / Corresponding author), Stephen F. Ashley, Raphael J. Heffron

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)
74 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We present the results of a structured discussion held in London in July 2014 involving a panel of experts drawn from three communities: specialists on aspects of risk and insurance; lawyers concerned with issues of nuclear law; and safety and environmental regulators. The discussions were held on the basis of participant anonymity. The process emphasised three considerations: conceptions of loss arising from a severe nuclear accident; the specifics of the Fukushima-Daiichi accident and what it means for policy and strategy going forward; and the future of liability regimes. We observe some stoicism from those closest to implementation of policies and procedures associated with nuclear risks, but a lower level of certainty and confidence among those concerned with nuclear energy regulation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)131-142
Number of pages12
JournalProcess Safety and Environmental Protection
Volume112
Issue numberPart A
Early online date20 Nov 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2017

Fingerprint

nuclear accident
Accidents
Insurance
liability
Nuclear energy
accident
safety
policy
loss
nuclear energy
insurance
regulation
nuclear risk

Keywords

  • Expert elicitation
  • Fukushima-Daiichi
  • Nuclear energy safety
  • Nuclear insurance
  • Nuclear regulation
  • Nuclear risk

Cite this

Nuttall, William J. ; Ashley, Stephen F. ; Heffron, Raphael J. / Compensating for severe nuclear accidents : An expert elucidation. In: Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 2017 ; Vol. 112, No. Part A. pp. 131-142.
@article{fce55a56763b4fb2adbbd7f61d6f630e,
title = "Compensating for severe nuclear accidents: An expert elucidation",
abstract = "We present the results of a structured discussion held in London in July 2014 involving a panel of experts drawn from three communities: specialists on aspects of risk and insurance; lawyers concerned with issues of nuclear law; and safety and environmental regulators. The discussions were held on the basis of participant anonymity. The process emphasised three considerations: conceptions of loss arising from a severe nuclear accident; the specifics of the Fukushima-Daiichi accident and what it means for policy and strategy going forward; and the future of liability regimes. We observe some stoicism from those closest to implementation of policies and procedures associated with nuclear risks, but a lower level of certainty and confidence among those concerned with nuclear energy regulation.",
keywords = "Expert elicitation, Fukushima-Daiichi, Nuclear energy safety, Nuclear insurance, Nuclear regulation, Nuclear risk",
author = "Nuttall, {William J.} and Ashley, {Stephen F.} and Heffron, {Raphael J.}",
note = "We acknowledge support from the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council under grant no. EP/K007580/1 for the research project Nuclear Risks: Environmental, Financial and Safety (NREFS) led by Professor Philip J. Thomas.",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.psep.2016.12.008",
language = "English",
volume = "112",
pages = "131--142",
journal = "Process Safety and Environmental Protection",
issn = "0957-5820",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "Part A",

}

Compensating for severe nuclear accidents : An expert elucidation. / Nuttall, William J. (Lead / Corresponding author); Ashley, Stephen F.; Heffron, Raphael J.

In: Process Safety and Environmental Protection, Vol. 112, No. Part A, 11.2017, p. 131-142.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Compensating for severe nuclear accidents

T2 - An expert elucidation

AU - Nuttall, William J.

AU - Ashley, Stephen F.

AU - Heffron, Raphael J.

N1 - We acknowledge support from the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council under grant no. EP/K007580/1 for the research project Nuclear Risks: Environmental, Financial and Safety (NREFS) led by Professor Philip J. Thomas.

PY - 2017/11

Y1 - 2017/11

N2 - We present the results of a structured discussion held in London in July 2014 involving a panel of experts drawn from three communities: specialists on aspects of risk and insurance; lawyers concerned with issues of nuclear law; and safety and environmental regulators. The discussions were held on the basis of participant anonymity. The process emphasised three considerations: conceptions of loss arising from a severe nuclear accident; the specifics of the Fukushima-Daiichi accident and what it means for policy and strategy going forward; and the future of liability regimes. We observe some stoicism from those closest to implementation of policies and procedures associated with nuclear risks, but a lower level of certainty and confidence among those concerned with nuclear energy regulation.

AB - We present the results of a structured discussion held in London in July 2014 involving a panel of experts drawn from three communities: specialists on aspects of risk and insurance; lawyers concerned with issues of nuclear law; and safety and environmental regulators. The discussions were held on the basis of participant anonymity. The process emphasised three considerations: conceptions of loss arising from a severe nuclear accident; the specifics of the Fukushima-Daiichi accident and what it means for policy and strategy going forward; and the future of liability regimes. We observe some stoicism from those closest to implementation of policies and procedures associated with nuclear risks, but a lower level of certainty and confidence among those concerned with nuclear energy regulation.

KW - Expert elicitation

KW - Fukushima-Daiichi

KW - Nuclear energy safety

KW - Nuclear insurance

KW - Nuclear regulation

KW - Nuclear risk

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034662819&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.psep.2016.12.008

DO - 10.1016/j.psep.2016.12.008

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85034662819

VL - 112

SP - 131

EP - 142

JO - Process Safety and Environmental Protection

JF - Process Safety and Environmental Protection

SN - 0957-5820

IS - Part A

ER -