Abstract
We present the results of a structured discussion held in London in July 2014 involving a panel of experts drawn from three communities: specialists on aspects of risk and insurance; lawyers concerned with issues of nuclear law; and safety and environmental regulators. The discussions were held on the basis of participant anonymity. The process emphasised three considerations: conceptions of loss arising from a severe nuclear accident; the specifics of the Fukushima-Daiichi accident and what it means for policy and strategy going forward; and the future of liability regimes. We observe some stoicism from those closest to implementation of policies and procedures associated with nuclear risks, but a lower level of certainty and confidence among those concerned with nuclear energy regulation.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 131-142 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Process Safety and Environmental Protection |
Volume | 112 |
Issue number | Part A |
Early online date | 20 Nov 2017 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Nov 2017 |
Keywords
- Expert elicitation
- Fukushima-Daiichi
- Nuclear energy safety
- Nuclear insurance
- Nuclear regulation
- Nuclear risk
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Environmental Engineering
- Environmental Chemistry
- General Chemical Engineering
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality