TY - JOUR
T1 - Computer-aided learning (CAL)
T2 - an effective way to teach the index of orthodontic treatment need (IOTN)?
AU - Lowe, Christopher I.
AU - Wright, Jean L.
AU - Bearn, David R.
N1 - Copyright 2012 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2001/12/1
Y1 - 2001/12/1
N2 - Objective: To identify if a lecture or access to a computer aided learning (CAL) programme is more effective in teaching undergraduate dental students IOTN. Design: Prospective controlled trial. Setting: University Dental Hospital of Manchester, 1999 Subjects: Eighty-five 3rd year undergraduate dental students allocated by pseudo-randomisation to two groups. The first group received a lecture and seminar on IOTN, and the second group were given a seminar and access to a purpose written CAL programme. Main Outcome Measure: A standard test was given to the two groups in the form of ten sets of patient records that they had to score with IOTN Dental Health Component (DHC) and Aesthetic Component (AC). Results: There was no difference in mean score for the two groups with AC score (5·02 and 5·03). The CAL group of students performed best for DHC grade (mean score 5·41 compared with 4·24 for lecture group) and this was statistically significant (p <0.01). Conclusion: Undergraduate dental students can learn to use IOTN as well or better when using a CAL programme compared with a lecture.
AB - Objective: To identify if a lecture or access to a computer aided learning (CAL) programme is more effective in teaching undergraduate dental students IOTN. Design: Prospective controlled trial. Setting: University Dental Hospital of Manchester, 1999 Subjects: Eighty-five 3rd year undergraduate dental students allocated by pseudo-randomisation to two groups. The first group received a lecture and seminar on IOTN, and the second group were given a seminar and access to a purpose written CAL programme. Main Outcome Measure: A standard test was given to the two groups in the form of ten sets of patient records that they had to score with IOTN Dental Health Component (DHC) and Aesthetic Component (AC). Results: There was no difference in mean score for the two groups with AC score (5·02 and 5·03). The CAL group of students performed best for DHC grade (mean score 5·41 compared with 4·24 for lecture group) and this was statistically significant (p <0.01). Conclusion: Undergraduate dental students can learn to use IOTN as well or better when using a CAL programme compared with a lecture.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035650550&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/ortho/28.4.307
DO - 10.1093/ortho/28.4.307
M3 - Article
C2 - 11709597
AN - SCOPUS:0035650550
SN - 1465-3125
VL - 28
SP - 307
EP - 311
JO - Journal of Orthodontics
JF - Journal of Orthodontics
IS - 4
ER -