Conciliation for marine transboundary energy resources

A law and economics approach

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

Abstract

The LOS Convention assigns the right to exploit resources exclusively to one or another coastal state. However, much of the world’s marine energy resources, such as oil, gas and renewables, straddle jurisdictional lines. There is a huge risk to the efficient, equitable, legally certain and ultimately secure exploitation of marine transboundary energy resources. The peril arising from the national assignment of the exclusive right to exploit such resources is pervasive, yet remains barely discussed methodically in the literature on the law of the sea, international economic law or cognate disciplines. The objective in this chapter is to characterise axioms of rationality underpinning international conciliation for the governance of marine transboundary energy resources. It takes the successful conclusion of the first ever conciliation between Timor-Leste and Australia, relating to the Greater Sunrise Gas field as a reference. The analytical foundations are the advance of social welfare, the instrumentality of contract, and the integration of legal concepts and economic analysis. The findings of this chapter produce interdisciplinary insights for the formulation of general principles, guiding not only the judicious administration of marine transboundary energy resources through unitisation agreements, but also future efforts at international conciliation to reach such agreements in the likely event of misunderstandings among coastal states over actual or potential resources. Such agreements will, long-term, be self-enforcing and help defuse tensions between riparian states.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe 21st Century Maritime Silk Road
Subtitle of host publicationChallenges and Opportunities for Asia and Europe
EditorsKeyuan Zou, Shicun Wu, Qiang Ye
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherRoutledge
Chapter12
Number of pages14
Edition1
ISBN (Electronic)9780429058585
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

economic approach
energy
Law
resources
coastal state
economic law
international economics
social welfare
international law
rationality
Indonesia
exploitation
governance
event
economics

Keywords

  • UN Convention on the Law of the Sea
  • marine transboundary energy resources
  • axioms of rationality
  • contract theory
  • international conciliation

Cite this

Röben, V., & Macatangay, R. (2019). Conciliation for marine transboundary energy resources: A law and economics approach. In K. Zou, S. Wu, & Q. Ye (Eds.), The 21st Century Maritime Silk Road: Challenges and Opportunities for Asia and Europe (1 ed.). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429058585-12
Röben, Volker ; Macatangay, Rafael. / Conciliation for marine transboundary energy resources : A law and economics approach. The 21st Century Maritime Silk Road: Challenges and Opportunities for Asia and Europe. editor / Keyuan Zou ; Shicun Wu ; Qiang Ye. 1. ed. London : Routledge, 2019.
@inbook{e5dd922951914d36af6c8893e023ad1c,
title = "Conciliation for marine transboundary energy resources: A law and economics approach",
abstract = "The LOS Convention assigns the right to exploit resources exclusively to one or another coastal state. However, much of the world’s marine energy resources, such as oil, gas and renewables, straddle jurisdictional lines. There is a huge risk to the efficient, equitable, legally certain and ultimately secure exploitation of marine transboundary energy resources. The peril arising from the national assignment of the exclusive right to exploit such resources is pervasive, yet remains barely discussed methodically in the literature on the law of the sea, international economic law or cognate disciplines. The objective in this chapter is to characterise axioms of rationality underpinning international conciliation for the governance of marine transboundary energy resources. It takes the successful conclusion of the first ever conciliation between Timor-Leste and Australia, relating to the Greater Sunrise Gas field as a reference. The analytical foundations are the advance of social welfare, the instrumentality of contract, and the integration of legal concepts and economic analysis. The findings of this chapter produce interdisciplinary insights for the formulation of general principles, guiding not only the judicious administration of marine transboundary energy resources through unitisation agreements, but also future efforts at international conciliation to reach such agreements in the likely event of misunderstandings among coastal states over actual or potential resources. Such agreements will, long-term, be self-enforcing and help defuse tensions between riparian states.",
keywords = "UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, marine transboundary energy resources, axioms of rationality, contract theory, international conciliation",
author = "Volker R{\"o}ben and Rafael Macatangay",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.4324/9780429058585-12",
language = "English",
editor = "Keyuan Zou and Shicun Wu and Qiang Ye",
booktitle = "The 21st Century Maritime Silk Road",
publisher = "Routledge",
address = "United Kingdom",
edition = "1",

}

Röben, V & Macatangay, R 2019, Conciliation for marine transboundary energy resources: A law and economics approach. in K Zou, S Wu & Q Ye (eds), The 21st Century Maritime Silk Road: Challenges and Opportunities for Asia and Europe. 1 edn, Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429058585-12

Conciliation for marine transboundary energy resources : A law and economics approach. / Röben, Volker; Macatangay, Rafael.

The 21st Century Maritime Silk Road: Challenges and Opportunities for Asia and Europe. ed. / Keyuan Zou; Shicun Wu; Qiang Ye. 1. ed. London : Routledge, 2019.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

TY - CHAP

T1 - Conciliation for marine transboundary energy resources

T2 - A law and economics approach

AU - Röben, Volker

AU - Macatangay, Rafael

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - The LOS Convention assigns the right to exploit resources exclusively to one or another coastal state. However, much of the world’s marine energy resources, such as oil, gas and renewables, straddle jurisdictional lines. There is a huge risk to the efficient, equitable, legally certain and ultimately secure exploitation of marine transboundary energy resources. The peril arising from the national assignment of the exclusive right to exploit such resources is pervasive, yet remains barely discussed methodically in the literature on the law of the sea, international economic law or cognate disciplines. The objective in this chapter is to characterise axioms of rationality underpinning international conciliation for the governance of marine transboundary energy resources. It takes the successful conclusion of the first ever conciliation between Timor-Leste and Australia, relating to the Greater Sunrise Gas field as a reference. The analytical foundations are the advance of social welfare, the instrumentality of contract, and the integration of legal concepts and economic analysis. The findings of this chapter produce interdisciplinary insights for the formulation of general principles, guiding not only the judicious administration of marine transboundary energy resources through unitisation agreements, but also future efforts at international conciliation to reach such agreements in the likely event of misunderstandings among coastal states over actual or potential resources. Such agreements will, long-term, be self-enforcing and help defuse tensions between riparian states.

AB - The LOS Convention assigns the right to exploit resources exclusively to one or another coastal state. However, much of the world’s marine energy resources, such as oil, gas and renewables, straddle jurisdictional lines. There is a huge risk to the efficient, equitable, legally certain and ultimately secure exploitation of marine transboundary energy resources. The peril arising from the national assignment of the exclusive right to exploit such resources is pervasive, yet remains barely discussed methodically in the literature on the law of the sea, international economic law or cognate disciplines. The objective in this chapter is to characterise axioms of rationality underpinning international conciliation for the governance of marine transboundary energy resources. It takes the successful conclusion of the first ever conciliation between Timor-Leste and Australia, relating to the Greater Sunrise Gas field as a reference. The analytical foundations are the advance of social welfare, the instrumentality of contract, and the integration of legal concepts and economic analysis. The findings of this chapter produce interdisciplinary insights for the formulation of general principles, guiding not only the judicious administration of marine transboundary energy resources through unitisation agreements, but also future efforts at international conciliation to reach such agreements in the likely event of misunderstandings among coastal states over actual or potential resources. Such agreements will, long-term, be self-enforcing and help defuse tensions between riparian states.

KW - UN Convention on the Law of the Sea

KW - marine transboundary energy resources

KW - axioms of rationality

KW - contract theory

KW - international conciliation

U2 - 10.4324/9780429058585-12

DO - 10.4324/9780429058585-12

M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)

BT - The 21st Century Maritime Silk Road

A2 - Zou, Keyuan

A2 - Wu, Shicun

A2 - Ye, Qiang

PB - Routledge

CY - London

ER -

Röben V, Macatangay R. Conciliation for marine transboundary energy resources: A law and economics approach. In Zou K, Wu S, Ye Q, editors, The 21st Century Maritime Silk Road: Challenges and Opportunities for Asia and Europe. 1 ed. London: Routledge. 2019 https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429058585-12