Considerations for using potential surrogate endpoints in cancer screening trials

Alexis B. Webb, Christine D. Berg, Philip E. Castle, David Crosby, Ruth Etzioni, Larry G. Kessler, Usha Menon, Mahesh Parmar, Robert J.C. Steele, Peter D. Sasieni (Lead / Corresponding author)

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)
47 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The requirement of large-scale expensive cancer screening trials spanning decades creates considerable barriers to the development, commercialisation, and implementation of novel screening tests. One way to address these problems is to use surrogate endpoints for the ultimate endpoint of interest, cancer mortality, at an earlier timepoint. This Review aims to highlight the issues underlying the choice and use of surrogate endpoints for cancer screening trials, to propose criteria for when and how we might use such endpoints, and to suggest possible candidates. We present the current landscape and challenges, and discuss lessons and shortcomings from the therapeutic trial setting. It is hugely challenging to validate a surrogate endpoint, even with carefully designed clinical studies. Nevertheless, we consider whether there are candidates that might satisfy the requirements defined by research and regulatory bodies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e183-e192
JournalThe Lancet Oncology
Volume25
Issue number5
Early online date29 Apr 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2024

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Considerations for using potential surrogate endpoints in cancer screening trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this