Constitutional reason and political identity

Shane O'Neill

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    This article presents a normative‐theoretical account of democratic legitimacy that meets the challenge of moral and cultural pluralism in a way that takes the avoidance of oppression and violence to be a fundamental imperative. The discourse‐theoretical perspective of jürgen Habermas reveals that reasoned agreement among citizens is the only alternative to political oppression. Pace Habermas, however, the legitimacy of even basic constitutional principles does not require us to agree with one another for the same reasons. While we can affirm such principles for a wide range of different reasons, the process of achieving reasoned agreements on contentious issues draws us together as citizens in loyalty to a particular, historical set of political institutions. The reasoned commitment to our constitution that we come to share in this ongoing process acts as an identity‐forming bond that allows us to live in peace with deep moral and cultural differences.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1-26
    Number of pages26
    JournalCritical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy
    Volume4
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2001

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Constitutional reason and political identity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this