Constitutionalism, Good Faith and the Doctrine of Specific Performance

Rights, Duties and Equitable Discretion

Luca Siliquini-Cinelli, Andrew Hutchison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article will explore the European roots of the doctrine of specific performance and the influence of transformative constitutionalism on these in recent times. The question whether specific performance is available as of right (as in the civil law), or only subject to judicial discretion (as in the common law), will be investigated. The demonstrated impact of constitutional rights on contract law in the mixed system of South Africa will be contrasted with developments in English and Australian contract law, where the common-law rules are more deeply entrenched and the potential scope for human rights-based development of these is arguably smaller, though still important. The article will argue, using comparative rules on specific performance as an example, that the concept of a duty of good faith or contractual fairness is likely to play a greater role in future in all three of the countries under consideration, reducing the common/civil/mixed legal systems divide
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)73-101
JournalThe South African Law Journal
Volume133
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2016

Fingerprint

constitutionalism
faith
doctrine
common law
performance
civil law
Law
legal system
fairness
human rights

Cite this

@article{63b80ee755034f54a8fe3df0cf1db201,
title = "Constitutionalism, Good Faith and the Doctrine of Specific Performance: Rights, Duties and Equitable Discretion",
abstract = "This article will explore the European roots of the doctrine of specific performance and the influence of transformative constitutionalism on these in recent times. The question whether specific performance is available as of right (as in the civil law), or only subject to judicial discretion (as in the common law), will be investigated. The demonstrated impact of constitutional rights on contract law in the mixed system of South Africa will be contrasted with developments in English and Australian contract law, where the common-law rules are more deeply entrenched and the potential scope for human rights-based development of these is arguably smaller, though still important. The article will argue, using comparative rules on specific performance as an example, that the concept of a duty of good faith or contractual fairness is likely to play a greater role in future in all three of the countries under consideration, reducing the common/civil/mixed legal systems divide",
author = "Luca Siliquini-Cinelli and Andrew Hutchison",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "133",
pages = "73--101",
journal = "The South African Law Journal",
issn = "0258-2503",
number = "1",

}

Constitutionalism, Good Faith and the Doctrine of Specific Performance : Rights, Duties and Equitable Discretion. / Siliquini-Cinelli, Luca; Hutchison, Andrew.

In: The South African Law Journal, Vol. 133, No. 1, 01.2016, p. 73-101.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Constitutionalism, Good Faith and the Doctrine of Specific Performance

T2 - Rights, Duties and Equitable Discretion

AU - Siliquini-Cinelli, Luca

AU - Hutchison, Andrew

PY - 2016/1

Y1 - 2016/1

N2 - This article will explore the European roots of the doctrine of specific performance and the influence of transformative constitutionalism on these in recent times. The question whether specific performance is available as of right (as in the civil law), or only subject to judicial discretion (as in the common law), will be investigated. The demonstrated impact of constitutional rights on contract law in the mixed system of South Africa will be contrasted with developments in English and Australian contract law, where the common-law rules are more deeply entrenched and the potential scope for human rights-based development of these is arguably smaller, though still important. The article will argue, using comparative rules on specific performance as an example, that the concept of a duty of good faith or contractual fairness is likely to play a greater role in future in all three of the countries under consideration, reducing the common/civil/mixed legal systems divide

AB - This article will explore the European roots of the doctrine of specific performance and the influence of transformative constitutionalism on these in recent times. The question whether specific performance is available as of right (as in the civil law), or only subject to judicial discretion (as in the common law), will be investigated. The demonstrated impact of constitutional rights on contract law in the mixed system of South Africa will be contrasted with developments in English and Australian contract law, where the common-law rules are more deeply entrenched and the potential scope for human rights-based development of these is arguably smaller, though still important. The article will argue, using comparative rules on specific performance as an example, that the concept of a duty of good faith or contractual fairness is likely to play a greater role in future in all three of the countries under consideration, reducing the common/civil/mixed legal systems divide

UR - https://journals.co.za/content/journal/10520/EJC-610ecce6f

M3 - Article

VL - 133

SP - 73

EP - 101

JO - The South African Law Journal

JF - The South African Law Journal

SN - 0258-2503

IS - 1

ER -