Constitutions and Bills of Rights: Invigorating or Placating Democracy?

Brian Christopher Jones

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Champions of constitutions and bills of rights regularly portray them as possessing significant, sometimes mysterious, powers. One characterisation is that newly implemented constitutions may invigorate a democracy, particularly at the ballot box. This paper challenges that notion by scrutinising a relatively unexplored area of constitutional performance: Voter turnout. In particular, it examines a number of jurisdictions that have recently implemented constitutions and bill of rights, finding that in many of them, voter turnout decreased after passage, sometimes significantly. As the argument for a codified British constitution endures, the findings of this paper provide provisional evidence that those advocating for such a device should be wary of touting its potentially invigorating democratic effects. Ultimately, however, the paper calls for more research into the area of constitutions and democratic performance, such as voter turnout.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)339-359
Number of pages21
JournalLegal Studies: the Journal of the Society of Legal Scholars
Volume38
Issue number3
Early online date21 Jun 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2018

Fingerprint

constitution
voter turnout
democracy
bill
performance
jurisdiction
evidence

Keywords

  • constitutions
  • bills of rights
  • voting
  • democracy
  • voting turnout
  • Written constitution
  • Unwritten Constitution
  • HRA 1998
  • democracy-hindering
  • democracy-reinforcing
  • constitutional theory
  • democratic participation

Cite this

@article{559f347963584536b93809536bc8dc6b,
title = "Constitutions and Bills of Rights: Invigorating or Placating Democracy?",
abstract = "Champions of constitutions and bills of rights regularly portray them as possessing significant, sometimes mysterious, powers. One characterisation is that newly implemented constitutions may invigorate a democracy, particularly at the ballot box. This paper challenges that notion by scrutinising a relatively unexplored area of constitutional performance: Voter turnout. In particular, it examines a number of jurisdictions that have recently implemented constitutions and bill of rights, finding that in many of them, voter turnout decreased after passage, sometimes significantly. As the argument for a codified British constitution endures, the findings of this paper provide provisional evidence that those advocating for such a device should be wary of touting its potentially invigorating democratic effects. Ultimately, however, the paper calls for more research into the area of constitutions and democratic performance, such as voter turnout.",
keywords = "constitutions, bills of rights, voting, democracy, voting turnout, Written constitution, Unwritten Constitution, HRA 1998, democracy-hindering, democracy-reinforcing, constitutional theory, democratic participation",
author = "Jones, {Brian Christopher}",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1017/lst.2017.26",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "339--359",
journal = "Legal Studies: the Journal of the Society of Legal Scholars",
issn = "0261-3875",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "3",

}

Constitutions and Bills of Rights : Invigorating or Placating Democracy? / Jones, Brian Christopher.

In: Legal Studies: the Journal of the Society of Legal Scholars, Vol. 38, No. 3, 09.2018, p. 339-359.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Constitutions and Bills of Rights

T2 - Invigorating or Placating Democracy?

AU - Jones, Brian Christopher

PY - 2018/9

Y1 - 2018/9

N2 - Champions of constitutions and bills of rights regularly portray them as possessing significant, sometimes mysterious, powers. One characterisation is that newly implemented constitutions may invigorate a democracy, particularly at the ballot box. This paper challenges that notion by scrutinising a relatively unexplored area of constitutional performance: Voter turnout. In particular, it examines a number of jurisdictions that have recently implemented constitutions and bill of rights, finding that in many of them, voter turnout decreased after passage, sometimes significantly. As the argument for a codified British constitution endures, the findings of this paper provide provisional evidence that those advocating for such a device should be wary of touting its potentially invigorating democratic effects. Ultimately, however, the paper calls for more research into the area of constitutions and democratic performance, such as voter turnout.

AB - Champions of constitutions and bills of rights regularly portray them as possessing significant, sometimes mysterious, powers. One characterisation is that newly implemented constitutions may invigorate a democracy, particularly at the ballot box. This paper challenges that notion by scrutinising a relatively unexplored area of constitutional performance: Voter turnout. In particular, it examines a number of jurisdictions that have recently implemented constitutions and bill of rights, finding that in many of them, voter turnout decreased after passage, sometimes significantly. As the argument for a codified British constitution endures, the findings of this paper provide provisional evidence that those advocating for such a device should be wary of touting its potentially invigorating democratic effects. Ultimately, however, the paper calls for more research into the area of constitutions and democratic performance, such as voter turnout.

KW - constitutions

KW - bills of rights

KW - voting

KW - democracy

KW - voting turnout

KW - Written constitution

KW - Unwritten Constitution

KW - HRA 1998

KW - democracy-hindering

KW - democracy-reinforcing

KW - constitutional theory

KW - democratic participation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051046888&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/lst.2017.26

DO - 10.1017/lst.2017.26

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 339

EP - 359

JO - Legal Studies: the Journal of the Society of Legal Scholars

JF - Legal Studies: the Journal of the Society of Legal Scholars

SN - 0261-3875

IS - 3

ER -