TY - JOUR
T1 - Continuum of Light Sensitivity in Atopic Dermatitis
T2 - A retrospective analysis of 139 cases in Scotland
AU - Chaiyabutr, Chayada
AU - Dawe, Robert
AU - Lesar, Andrea
AU - Ibbotson, Sally H.
N1 - © 2024 by the American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - Background: Previous reports have characterized photosensitivity in atopic dermatitis (AD), but with differences in terminology and criteria. Objective: This study aims to assess outcomes in 139 patients with AD referred for photodiagnostic testing and to establish diagnostic criteria for photosensitivity in AD. Methods: Clinical and photodiagnostic data were reviewed, categorizing photosensitivity into photoexacerbated AD, photosensitive AD, and chronic actinic dermatitis. Results: Of the patient cohort, the mean age was 42.6 ± 16.7 years, and 61.9% were men. In total, 51.1% of the patients with photoexacerbated AD had normal monochromator phototesting, and 7.9% of the patients with photosensitive AD displayed slight-to-moderate ultraviolet (UV)-A sensitivity (≥30% of normal minimal erythema dose [MED]) and mostly normal or slightly reduced UV-B MEDs (≥80% of normal MED). Conversely, 41% of the patients had chronic actinic dermatitis, and 93% of this group demonstrated significant UV-B sensitivity, with very low UV-B MEDs (<80% of normal MED) and/or very low UV-A MEDs (<30% of normal MED). No significant differences in sex, age, or skin phototype were observed between the groups. Serial phototesting revealed changes in photosensitivity status over time in 8 patients. Limitations: A small sample size and retrospective design. Conclusions: This study highlights the heterogeneity of photosensitivity patterns in patients with AD and the importance of follow-up assessments due to potential shifts in disease spectrum over time.
AB - Background: Previous reports have characterized photosensitivity in atopic dermatitis (AD), but with differences in terminology and criteria. Objective: This study aims to assess outcomes in 139 patients with AD referred for photodiagnostic testing and to establish diagnostic criteria for photosensitivity in AD. Methods: Clinical and photodiagnostic data were reviewed, categorizing photosensitivity into photoexacerbated AD, photosensitive AD, and chronic actinic dermatitis. Results: Of the patient cohort, the mean age was 42.6 ± 16.7 years, and 61.9% were men. In total, 51.1% of the patients with photoexacerbated AD had normal monochromator phototesting, and 7.9% of the patients with photosensitive AD displayed slight-to-moderate ultraviolet (UV)-A sensitivity (≥30% of normal minimal erythema dose [MED]) and mostly normal or slightly reduced UV-B MEDs (≥80% of normal MED). Conversely, 41% of the patients had chronic actinic dermatitis, and 93% of this group demonstrated significant UV-B sensitivity, with very low UV-B MEDs (<80% of normal MED) and/or very low UV-A MEDs (<30% of normal MED). No significant differences in sex, age, or skin phototype were observed between the groups. Serial phototesting revealed changes in photosensitivity status over time in 8 patients. Limitations: A small sample size and retrospective design. Conclusions: This study highlights the heterogeneity of photosensitivity patterns in patients with AD and the importance of follow-up assessments due to potential shifts in disease spectrum over time.
KW - atopic dermatitis
KW - chronic actinic dermatitis
KW - photoaggravated
KW - photoexacerbated
KW - photosensitivity
KW - phototesting
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85203793209&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jaad.2024.07.1502
DO - 10.1016/j.jaad.2024.07.1502
M3 - Article
C2 - 39181405
SN - 0190-9622
VL - 91
SP - 1086
EP - 1093
JO - Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
JF - Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
IS - 6
ER -