Corporate killing as a corporate governance issue

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    9 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In May 2000 the government proposed the introduction of a new offence of corporate killing founded on the concept of “management failure”. Two specific corporate risks are investigated; the risk that the company’s operations will kill one of its employees or a member of the public and the risk that the company will be convicted of an offence indicating corporate responsibility for that killing. The article demonstrates, firstly, that the risks associated with corporate killing fall within the ambit of the Turnbull Guidance. More importantly, it uses this particular, not directly financial, example to illustrate the proposition that Turnbull should not be associated with closure; rather it should be associated with the opening of a new level of corporate governance debate that will focus on corporate behaviour rather than corporate policy.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)47-54
    Number of pages8
    JournalCorporate Governance: an International Review
    Volume10
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jan 2002

    Fingerprint

    Personnel
    Corporate governance
    Industry
    Employees
    Closure
    Corporate responsibility
    Management failures
    Government
    Corporate policy
    Guidance

    Keywords

    • Corporate governance
    • Criminal law
    • Manslaughter
    • Corporate responsibility
    • Risk management
    • Health and safety

    Cite this

    @article{ce0ecefc2cac414387d5c5cf0d2be74c,
    title = "Corporate killing as a corporate governance issue",
    abstract = "In May 2000 the government proposed the introduction of a new offence of corporate killing founded on the concept of “management failure”. Two specific corporate risks are investigated; the risk that the company’s operations will kill one of its employees or a member of the public and the risk that the company will be convicted of an offence indicating corporate responsibility for that killing. The article demonstrates, firstly, that the risks associated with corporate killing fall within the ambit of the Turnbull Guidance. More importantly, it uses this particular, not directly financial, example to illustrate the proposition that Turnbull should not be associated with closure; rather it should be associated with the opening of a new level of corporate governance debate that will focus on corporate behaviour rather than corporate policy.",
    keywords = "Corporate governance, Criminal law, Manslaughter, Corporate responsibility, Risk management, Health and safety",
    author = "Alice Belcher",
    note = "dc.publisher: Blackwell",
    year = "2002",
    month = "1",
    doi = "10.1111/1467-8683.00266",
    language = "English",
    volume = "10",
    pages = "47--54",
    journal = "Corporate Governance: an International Review",
    issn = "0964-8410",
    publisher = "Wiley",
    number = "1",

    }

    Corporate killing as a corporate governance issue. / Belcher, Alice.

    In: Corporate Governance: an International Review, Vol. 10, No. 1, 01.2002, p. 47-54.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Corporate killing as a corporate governance issue

    AU - Belcher, Alice

    N1 - dc.publisher: Blackwell

    PY - 2002/1

    Y1 - 2002/1

    N2 - In May 2000 the government proposed the introduction of a new offence of corporate killing founded on the concept of “management failure”. Two specific corporate risks are investigated; the risk that the company’s operations will kill one of its employees or a member of the public and the risk that the company will be convicted of an offence indicating corporate responsibility for that killing. The article demonstrates, firstly, that the risks associated with corporate killing fall within the ambit of the Turnbull Guidance. More importantly, it uses this particular, not directly financial, example to illustrate the proposition that Turnbull should not be associated with closure; rather it should be associated with the opening of a new level of corporate governance debate that will focus on corporate behaviour rather than corporate policy.

    AB - In May 2000 the government proposed the introduction of a new offence of corporate killing founded on the concept of “management failure”. Two specific corporate risks are investigated; the risk that the company’s operations will kill one of its employees or a member of the public and the risk that the company will be convicted of an offence indicating corporate responsibility for that killing. The article demonstrates, firstly, that the risks associated with corporate killing fall within the ambit of the Turnbull Guidance. More importantly, it uses this particular, not directly financial, example to illustrate the proposition that Turnbull should not be associated with closure; rather it should be associated with the opening of a new level of corporate governance debate that will focus on corporate behaviour rather than corporate policy.

    KW - Corporate governance

    KW - Criminal law

    KW - Manslaughter

    KW - Corporate responsibility

    KW - Risk management

    KW - Health and safety

    U2 - 10.1111/1467-8683.00266

    DO - 10.1111/1467-8683.00266

    M3 - Article

    VL - 10

    SP - 47

    EP - 54

    JO - Corporate Governance: an International Review

    JF - Corporate Governance: an International Review

    SN - 0964-8410

    IS - 1

    ER -