Corporate response to climate change: language, power and symbolic construction

John Ferguson, Thereza Raquel Sales de Aguiar (Lead / Corresponding author), Anne Fearfull

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    11 Citations (Scopus)
    3 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Purpose: The objective of this paper is to explore corporate communications related to climate change in both a voluntary and mandatory setting. Adopting a critical perspective, the paper examines how companies who participated in the voluntary UK Emissions Trading Scheme (UK ETS) and the UK Government’s mandatory Carbon Reduction Commitment Energy Efficiency Scheme (CRC) positioned themselves within the climate change debate. In particular, our analysis draws attention to how companies, through their communicative practice, helped to constitute and reproduce the structure of the field in which they operate.

    Design/Methodology/Approach: A context-sensitive discursive analysis of 99 stand-alone reports produced by companies participating in the UK ETS and CRC over a nine-year period. Our analysis is informed by Thompson’s (1990) depth-hermeneutic framework, which mediates the connection between linguistic strategies and the institutional field.

    Findings: Our analysis suggests that companies tended to adopt particular linguistic strategies in their communications related to climate change. For example, the strategy of ‘rationalization’ was employed in order to emphasise the organisational ‘opportunities’ resulting from climate change; in this sense, companies sought to exploit climate crises in order to advance a doctrine that endorsed market-based solutions. A noteworthy finding was that in the mandatory CRC period, there was a notable shift towards the employment of the strategies that Thompson (1990) refers to as ‘differentiation’ - whereby companies attempted to displace responsibility by presenting either government or suppliers as barriers to progress.

    Originality/Value – This paper explores how disclosure on climate change evolved while organisations participate in voluntary and compulsory climate change initiatives. In this respect, the analysis is informed by the social and political context in which the disclosure was produced.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)278-304
    Number of pages52
    JournalAccounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal
    Volume29
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 15 Feb 2016

    Fingerprint

    Language
    Climate change
    Government
    Emissions trading scheme
    Disclosure
    Responsibility
    Corporate communications
    Communication
    Suppliers
    Rationalization
    Design methodology
    Hermeneutics
    Energy efficiency
    Critical perspective
    Carbon
    Climate

    Keywords

    • Climate change
    • Discourse
    • Ideology
    • Environmental disclosure
    • Emissions trading scheme

    Cite this

    Ferguson, John ; Sales de Aguiar, Thereza Raquel ; Fearfull, Anne. / Corporate response to climate change : language, power and symbolic construction. In: Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. 2016 ; Vol. 29, No. 2. pp. 278-304.
    @article{53b74b4011664a04a9929f8427b95feb,
    title = "Corporate response to climate change: language, power and symbolic construction",
    abstract = "Purpose: The objective of this paper is to explore corporate communications related to climate change in both a voluntary and mandatory setting. Adopting a critical perspective, the paper examines how companies who participated in the voluntary UK Emissions Trading Scheme (UK ETS) and the UK Government’s mandatory Carbon Reduction Commitment Energy Efficiency Scheme (CRC) positioned themselves within the climate change debate. In particular, our analysis draws attention to how companies, through their communicative practice, helped to constitute and reproduce the structure of the field in which they operate.Design/Methodology/Approach: A context-sensitive discursive analysis of 99 stand-alone reports produced by companies participating in the UK ETS and CRC over a nine-year period. Our analysis is informed by Thompson’s (1990) depth-hermeneutic framework, which mediates the connection between linguistic strategies and the institutional field.Findings: Our analysis suggests that companies tended to adopt particular linguistic strategies in their communications related to climate change. For example, the strategy of ‘rationalization’ was employed in order to emphasise the organisational ‘opportunities’ resulting from climate change; in this sense, companies sought to exploit climate crises in order to advance a doctrine that endorsed market-based solutions. A noteworthy finding was that in the mandatory CRC period, there was a notable shift towards the employment of the strategies that Thompson (1990) refers to as ‘differentiation’ - whereby companies attempted to displace responsibility by presenting either government or suppliers as barriers to progress.Originality/Value – This paper explores how disclosure on climate change evolved while organisations participate in voluntary and compulsory climate change initiatives. In this respect, the analysis is informed by the social and political context in which the disclosure was produced.",
    keywords = "Climate change, Discourse, Ideology, Environmental disclosure, Emissions trading scheme",
    author = "John Ferguson and {Sales de Aguiar}, {Thereza Raquel} and Anne Fearfull",
    year = "2016",
    month = "2",
    day = "15",
    doi = "10.1108/AAAJ-09-2013-1465",
    language = "English",
    volume = "29",
    pages = "278--304",
    journal = "Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal",
    issn = "0951-3574",
    publisher = "Emerald",
    number = "2",

    }

    Corporate response to climate change : language, power and symbolic construction. / Ferguson, John; Sales de Aguiar, Thereza Raquel (Lead / Corresponding author); Fearfull, Anne.

    In: Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 29, No. 2, 15.02.2016, p. 278-304.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Corporate response to climate change

    T2 - language, power and symbolic construction

    AU - Ferguson, John

    AU - Sales de Aguiar, Thereza Raquel

    AU - Fearfull, Anne

    PY - 2016/2/15

    Y1 - 2016/2/15

    N2 - Purpose: The objective of this paper is to explore corporate communications related to climate change in both a voluntary and mandatory setting. Adopting a critical perspective, the paper examines how companies who participated in the voluntary UK Emissions Trading Scheme (UK ETS) and the UK Government’s mandatory Carbon Reduction Commitment Energy Efficiency Scheme (CRC) positioned themselves within the climate change debate. In particular, our analysis draws attention to how companies, through their communicative practice, helped to constitute and reproduce the structure of the field in which they operate.Design/Methodology/Approach: A context-sensitive discursive analysis of 99 stand-alone reports produced by companies participating in the UK ETS and CRC over a nine-year period. Our analysis is informed by Thompson’s (1990) depth-hermeneutic framework, which mediates the connection between linguistic strategies and the institutional field.Findings: Our analysis suggests that companies tended to adopt particular linguistic strategies in their communications related to climate change. For example, the strategy of ‘rationalization’ was employed in order to emphasise the organisational ‘opportunities’ resulting from climate change; in this sense, companies sought to exploit climate crises in order to advance a doctrine that endorsed market-based solutions. A noteworthy finding was that in the mandatory CRC period, there was a notable shift towards the employment of the strategies that Thompson (1990) refers to as ‘differentiation’ - whereby companies attempted to displace responsibility by presenting either government or suppliers as barriers to progress.Originality/Value – This paper explores how disclosure on climate change evolved while organisations participate in voluntary and compulsory climate change initiatives. In this respect, the analysis is informed by the social and political context in which the disclosure was produced.

    AB - Purpose: The objective of this paper is to explore corporate communications related to climate change in both a voluntary and mandatory setting. Adopting a critical perspective, the paper examines how companies who participated in the voluntary UK Emissions Trading Scheme (UK ETS) and the UK Government’s mandatory Carbon Reduction Commitment Energy Efficiency Scheme (CRC) positioned themselves within the climate change debate. In particular, our analysis draws attention to how companies, through their communicative practice, helped to constitute and reproduce the structure of the field in which they operate.Design/Methodology/Approach: A context-sensitive discursive analysis of 99 stand-alone reports produced by companies participating in the UK ETS and CRC over a nine-year period. Our analysis is informed by Thompson’s (1990) depth-hermeneutic framework, which mediates the connection between linguistic strategies and the institutional field.Findings: Our analysis suggests that companies tended to adopt particular linguistic strategies in their communications related to climate change. For example, the strategy of ‘rationalization’ was employed in order to emphasise the organisational ‘opportunities’ resulting from climate change; in this sense, companies sought to exploit climate crises in order to advance a doctrine that endorsed market-based solutions. A noteworthy finding was that in the mandatory CRC period, there was a notable shift towards the employment of the strategies that Thompson (1990) refers to as ‘differentiation’ - whereby companies attempted to displace responsibility by presenting either government or suppliers as barriers to progress.Originality/Value – This paper explores how disclosure on climate change evolved while organisations participate in voluntary and compulsory climate change initiatives. In this respect, the analysis is informed by the social and political context in which the disclosure was produced.

    KW - Climate change

    KW - Discourse

    KW - Ideology

    KW - Environmental disclosure

    KW - Emissions trading scheme

    U2 - 10.1108/AAAJ-09-2013-1465

    DO - 10.1108/AAAJ-09-2013-1465

    M3 - Article

    VL - 29

    SP - 278

    EP - 304

    JO - Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal

    JF - Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal

    SN - 0951-3574

    IS - 2

    ER -