Cost-effectiveness analysis of fidaxomicin versus vancomycin in Clostridium difficile infection

Dilip Nathwani, Oliver A. Cornely, Anke K. Van Engen, Olatunji Odufowora-Sita, Peny Retsa, Isaac A. O. Odeyemi (Lead / Corresponding author)

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    54 Citations (Scopus)
    155 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    OBJECTIVES: Fidaxomicin was non-inferior to vancomycin with respect to clinical cure rates in the treatment of Clostridium difficile infections (CDIs) in two Phase III trials, but was associated with significantly fewer recurrences than vancomycin. This economic analysis investigated the cost-effectiveness of fidaxomicin compared with vancomycin in patients with severe CDI and in patients with their first CDI recurrence.

    METHODS: A 1 year time horizon Markov model with seven health states was developed from the perspective of Scottish public healthcare providers. Model inputs for effectiveness, resource use, direct costs and utilities were obtained from published sources and a Scottish expert panel. The main model outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed as cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY), for fidaxomicin versus vancomycin; ICERs were interpreted using willingness-to-pay thresholds of £20,000/QALY and £30,000/QALY. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.

    RESULTS: Total costs were similar with fidaxomicin and vancomycin in patients with severe CDI (£14,515 and £14,344, respectively) and in patients with a first recurrence (£16,535 and £16,926, respectively). Improvements in clinical outcomes with fidaxomicin resulted in small QALY gains versus vancomycin (severe CDI, +0.010; patients with first recurrence, +0.019). Fidaxomicin was cost-effective in severe CDI (ICER £16,529/QALY) and dominant (i.e. more effective and less costly) in patients with a first recurrence. The probability that fidaxomicin was cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £30,000/QALY was 60% for severe CDI and 68% in a first recurrence.

    CONCLUSIONS: Fidaxomicin is cost-effective in patients with severe CDI and in patients with a first CDI recurrence versus vancomycin.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)2901-2912
    Number of pages12
    JournalJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
    Volume69
    Issue number11
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 2014

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Cost-effectiveness analysis of fidaxomicin versus vancomycin in <i>Clostridium difficile</i> infection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this