Creative pedagogic methods for self-guided embodied thinking and learning about animal research

TY - JOUR

T1 - Creative pedagogic methods for self-guided embodied thinking and learning about animal research

AU - Roe, Emma

AU - Bailey, Sarah J.

AU - Mackenzie, Louise

AU - Tremoleda, Jordi L.

PY - 2025/10/24

Y1 - 2025/10/24

N2 - A prevailing view suggests that with greater knowledge, the public might respond differently to opinion surveys. This paper examines animal research – a domain marked by ethical complexity - to explore how curiosity and creativity can be harnessed to engage people with conflicting values and emotions. Rather than focusing solely on knowledge acquisition, the paper conceptualizes and illustrates how embodied creative methods can enable the public and industry professionals to make, to co-create their own knowledges about animal research. Three critical observations of contemporary engagement efforts are offered. Firstly, while existing approaches have made notable strides in informing and educating the public, they rely on the active participation of self-selecting learners. Secondly, engagement efforts tend to emphasise defending the principles of animal research, often overlooking the diverse everyday practices that constitutes the industry. Thirdly, a didactic, mentalist communication style prevails, reinforcing a hierarchical dynamic between expert and non-expert participants. Embodied creative methods are proposed not as tools for data collection, but as means to explore experiences and knowledge-making practices in novel ways. The paper presents three examples of such engagements authored by an artist, a pharmacologist and a veterinarian including making artwork, and two workshop activities - The Mouse Exchange and Care-full stories. These initiatives sensitively surface the complexities of the human-animal relationship at the heart of animal research. The examples show how engagements centered on creative embodied methods foster curiosity and help overcome anxieties that inhibit engagement. Reflecting on these contributions prompts a consideration about whether such activities are adequately recognised within the current Concordat on Openness in Animal Research. The paper concludes by proposing a rewording to reflect a more evolved vision of openness in animal research for the decades ahead.

AB - A prevailing view suggests that with greater knowledge, the public might respond differently to opinion surveys. This paper examines animal research – a domain marked by ethical complexity - to explore how curiosity and creativity can be harnessed to engage people with conflicting values and emotions. Rather than focusing solely on knowledge acquisition, the paper conceptualizes and illustrates how embodied creative methods can enable the public and industry professionals to make, to co-create their own knowledges about animal research. Three critical observations of contemporary engagement efforts are offered. Firstly, while existing approaches have made notable strides in informing and educating the public, they rely on the active participation of self-selecting learners. Secondly, engagement efforts tend to emphasise defending the principles of animal research, often overlooking the diverse everyday practices that constitutes the industry. Thirdly, a didactic, mentalist communication style prevails, reinforcing a hierarchical dynamic between expert and non-expert participants. Embodied creative methods are proposed not as tools for data collection, but as means to explore experiences and knowledge-making practices in novel ways. The paper presents three examples of such engagements authored by an artist, a pharmacologist and a veterinarian including making artwork, and two workshop activities - The Mouse Exchange and Care-full stories. These initiatives sensitively surface the complexities of the human-animal relationship at the heart of animal research. The examples show how engagements centered on creative embodied methods foster curiosity and help overcome anxieties that inhibit engagement. Reflecting on these contributions prompts a consideration about whether such activities are adequately recognised within the current Concordat on Openness in Animal Research. The paper concludes by proposing a rewording to reflect a more evolved vision of openness in animal research for the decades ahead.

U2 - 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.24930.1

DO - 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.24930.1

M3 - Article

SN - 2398-502X

VL - 10

JO - Wellcome Open Research

JF - Wellcome Open Research

M1 - 595

ER -