Abstract
A single inhaler containing inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long acting beta-agonists (LABA)/long acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) is a more convenient way of delivering triple therapy in patients with COPD Single triple has been shown to be superior at reducing exacerbations and improving quality of life compared to LABA/LAMA especially in patients with a prior history of frequent exacerbations and blood eosinophilia, who have ICS responsive disease. The corollary is that patients with infrequent exacerbations who are non eosinophilic may be safely de-escalated from triple to LABA/LAMA without loss of control. Pointedly there is a substantially increased risk of pneumonia associated with the triple containing fluticasone furoate but not belcometasone dipropionate. Since triple is also better than ICS/LABA at reducing exacerbations and improving lung function, symptoms and quality of life, this brings into question the rationale for using ICS/LABA anymore. Hence we propose a simplified pragmatic decision process based on symptoms prior exacerbation history and blood eosinophils to select which patients should be given single triple or LABA/LAMA. Differences in patient preference inhaler devices formulations and drugs will also determine which triple inhaler prescribers elect to use.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 3003-3009 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease |
Volume | 13 |
Issue number | 13 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 28 Sept 2018 |
Keywords
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- Inhaled Corticosteroid
- Long acting beta-agonist
- Long acting muscarinic antagonist
- Lung function
- Exacerbation
- lung function
- long-acting beta-agonist
- long-acting muscarinic antagonist
- inhaled corticosteroid
- COPD
- exacerbation
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Health Policy
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine