Abstract
Den Europæiske Menneskerettighedsdomstol kritiseres ikke kun for at være aktivistisk, men også for ikke at være aktivistisk nok. Modsat det indtryk, man kunne få af debatten, er domstolen ofte tilbageholdende i sin fortolkning, skriver professor i folkeret Jacques Hartmann.
The European Court of Human Rights is criticized not only for being activist, but also for not being activist enough. Contrary to the impression one might get from the debate, the court is often reserved in its interpretation, writes professor of international law Jacques Hartmann.
The European Court of Human Rights is criticized not only for being activist, but also for not being activist enough. Contrary to the impression one might get from the debate, the court is often reserved in its interpretation, writes professor of international law Jacques Hartmann.
| Translated title of the contribution | Danish law professor in Scotland: The debate about the European Court of Human Rights presents a distorted picture] |
|---|---|
| Original language | Other |
| Place of Publication | Berlingske |
| Publication status | Published - 30 Sept 2024 |